Card image cap

Kay Christofferson's Ratings and Endorsements

Office:

On The Ballot: Running, Republican for State House (UT) - District 53

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

74%
2023
73%
2022
83%
2022
77%
2021
71%
2020
75%
2019
62%
2018
68%
2017
76%
2016
71%
2015
76%
2014
68%
2013
64%
2022
64%
2022
75%
2021
75%
2021
62%
2021
62%
2021
60%
2020
60%
2020
61%
2020
61%
2020
68%
2019
68%
2019
60%
2019
60%
2019
59%
2018
59%
2018
58%
2018
58%
2018
60%
2017
60%
2017
60%
2017
60%
2017
60%
2016
60%
2016
52%
2016
52%
2016
59%
2015
59%
2015
62%
2015
62%
2015
70%
2014
70%
2014
64%
2014
64%
2014
58%
2013
58%
2013
58%
2013
58%
2013
85%
2015
100%
2015
77%
2014
81%
2014
73%
2013
29%
2023
29%
2023
56%
2021
56%
2021
30%
2020
30%
2020
22%
2019
22%
2019
33%
2018
33%
2018
38%
2016
38%
2016
50%
2015
50%
2015
38%
2014
38%
2014
38%
2013
38%
2013
74%
2023
73%
2022
83%
2022
77%
2021
71%
2020
75%
2019
62%
2018
68%
2017
76%
2016
71%
2015
76%
2014
68%
2013
67%
2023
86%
2022
64%
2021
77%
2020
75%
2019
86%
2018
94%
2018
92%
2017
84%
2017
82%
2016
82%
2016
84%
2015-2020
73%
2015
82%
2014
91%
2013
73%
2023
83%
2022
73%
2022
77%
2021
71%
2020
75%
2019
62%
2018
68%
2017
76%
2016
71%
2015
76%
2014
68%
2013
46%
2019
46%
2019
73%
2023
73%
2022
83%
2022
77%
2021
71%
2020
75%
2019
62%
2018
68%
2017
76%
2016
71%
2015
76%
2014
68%
2013
67%
2023
86%
2022
64%
2021
77%
2020
75%
2019
94%
2018
86%
2018
92%
2017
84%
2017
82%
2016
82%
2016
84%
2015-2020
73%
2015
82%
2014
91%
2013
arrow_upward