BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mr. AL GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to say that I stand at
the podium today to thank two Members of Congress who last week took
the lead on LEAD. LEAD is Law Enforcement Appreciation Day. I want to
thank Congresspersons Jolly and Reichert for what they did on last
Friday in paying a special tribute, if you will, to the 900,000-plus
who serve us as peace officers in the United States of America.
Mr. Speaker, I am very proud to say that in my family I had an uncle
who was a peace officer, and he had an influence on my life that
literally changed the course of my life and set me on the course that I
currently am pursuing. My uncle and I were riding along together, and I
was asking a lot of questions. He made a statement that became
indelible with me. He said: This boy is asking so many questions, I
think he is going to be a lawyer.
I was younger than 10. I don't think I knew what a lawyer was. I am
not sure how old I was. I remember I was very young. But I also
remember that if my uncle thought that being a lawyer was a good thing
for me, then that was a thing that I should do.
This was a peace officer, a police officer, a deputy sheriff that had
a lasting impact on my life. I am so grateful for his service to his
community and the way he has been an outstanding citizen in his
community. His name is Dallas Yates.
I am proud to tell you that when I saw these Congresspersons paying
tribute to peace officers, police officers, I concluded that I would
have to add to the Record some thoughts because there is a phrase that
we use quite often when we reference peace officers. It is styled, ``in
the line of duty''--``in the line of duty.'' And officers do so many
things in the line of duty. Some of these things, quite frankly, are
not things that they are expected to do, but they do them anyway.
The Washington Post reported that two officers delivered a baby on
Christmas Day in the line of duty. They were on duty when they did it.
Officers are not trained to deliver babies, but when called upon, they
take the lead to do what needs to be done.
Think of the thousands of people who have been stranded and who were
helped by peace officers: flood victims helped by peace officers,
persons with something as simple as a flat tire helped by police
officers, all in the course and scope of their duty. And then, of
course, we have officers who have literally gone into fires to save
lives. It has been reported that officers have done this. In fact, the
Tulsa World recently reported that an officer saved a life from a fire
in the line of duty, in the course and scope of duty.
That phrase means a lot more than simply lending a helping hand. ``In
the line of duty'' means sometimes that officers lose their lives. In
this country, we had 27 officers die in 2013 as a result of felonious
incidents all occurring in the line of duty. We had 49 that died from
accidents in the line of duty.
Mr. Speaker, when this term is used now, ``in the line of duty,'' to
refer to these officers who make the ultimate sacrifice so that others
may have a better life, you have better appreciation for what ``in the
line of duty'' means. It is more than mere words. It means sacrifice.
Many families have had to mourn the loss of a loved one in the line of
duty.
So I am proud to salute the officers--the 900,000-plus--and I thank
the Congresspersons who led the discussion celebrating, appreciating,
and commemorating those who have served and have gone on to make their
transition in the line of duty.
I think it appropriate to close with these words that express some
thoughts about how we measure our lives and how the life of a person is
measured and appreciated. Ruth Smeltzer reminds us:
Some measure their lives by days and years,
Others by heartthrobs, passion, and tears.
But the surest measure under the sun
Is what in your lifetime for others you have done.
I want to thank the 900,000-plus officers for what they have done for
others in their lifetime in the line of duty. God bless you. God bless
the United States of America.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT