Leading Congressional Democrats Introduce The No Federal Contracts For Corporate Deserters Act

Statement

Leading Democrats from both chambers of Congress--Representatives Rosa DeLauro and Lloyd Doggett, and Senators Dick Durbin and Carl Levin--today introduced the No Federal Contracts for Corporate Deserters Act. The legislation would bar contracts from going to businesses that incorporate overseas, are majority-owned by shareholders of the old U.S. corporation, and do not have substantial business opportunities in the foreign country in which they are incorporating.

"For too long we have let companies avoid their tax obligations at the expense of companies who pay their fair share," DeLauro said. "Even worse, the federal government has been subsidizing this bad behavior, by continuing to reward inverted companies with lucrative federal contracts. These companies take advantage of our education system, our research and development incentives, our skilled workforce, and our infrastructure, all supported by U.S. taxpayers, to build their businesses. But when the tax bill comes due, they hide overseas. Yet suddenly, when federal contracts are being applied for, they are all as American as Uncle Sam once again. This has to stop."

"With every successful inversion, the tax burden increases on the rest of us to pay what the corporate inverter doesn't," said Durbin. "The burden is made worse by allowing companies to profit off of federal contracts paid for by U.S. taxpayers, while those very companies run from their U.S. tax responsibility. We should make permanent the long-standing ban on federal contracts for corporations that have renounced their American corporate citizenship."

"Americans are rightly outraged at the wave of corporations seeking to abandon the U.S. to avoid their taxes," Levin said. "We ought to put a stop to all inversions, but at the very least, we should stop these companies from receiving federal funding from the same American families who have to pick up the tax burden inverted companies shrug off."

"Corporations that renounce their citizenship not only invert their business operations but pervert our laws," said Doggett. "Those dodging their fair share of taxes should not be rewarded with taxpayer-funded government contracts."

Current law defines a company as being inverted if at least 80