Brown Tree Snake Control and Eradication Act of 2004

By: Ed Case
By: Ed Case
Date: Sept. 28, 2004
Location: Washington, DC

BROWN TREE SNAKE CONTROL AND ERADICATION ACT OF 2004 -- (House of Representatives - September 28, 2004)

(BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT)

Mr. CASE. Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support House passage of H.R. 3479, the Brown Tree Snake Control and Eradication Act of 2004.

Last November I was pleased to join with my colleagues from Guam, Congresswoman MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, and Congressman NEIL ABERCROMBIE from Hawaii, in introducing this important legislation.

This bill proposes a long-overdue comprehensive approach, through the Departments of Interior and Agriculture, to eradicate the brown tree snake in Guam and to prevent its introduction to jurisdictions in the Pacific, including my home state of Hawaii. There are other Federal agencies, particularly the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security, that are crucial to our efforts, and I am fully supportive of resources and funding expended by or given to these agencies in combating the brown tree snake.

I greatly appreciate the assistance of my colleagues on the House Resources and Agriculture Committees for their hard work on bringing this bill to the floor: House Resources Committee Chairman RICHARD POMBO and Ranking Member NICK RAHALL; House Resources Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans Chairman WAYNE GILCHREST and Ranking Member FRANK PALLONE; House Agriculture Committee Chairman BOB GOODLATTE and Ranking Member CHARLES STENHOLM; and House Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock and Horticulture Chairman ROBIN HAYES and Ranking Member MIKE ROSS.

The devastating ecological, economic, and human health impacts of the brown tree snake have been long known among the affected jurisdictions in the Pacific and the federal, state, and territorial agencies charged with implementing brown tree snake preventative control and eradication programs.

However, it is clear that unless we address this challenge with a long-term, coordinated, and comprehensive approach, Guam will continue to struggle with the adverse impacts of the brown tree snake, and we in Hawaii will increasingly risk the introduction of the snake into our fragile environment. A total of eight brown tree snakes have been found live or dead in Hawaii since the mid-1980s. All have been associated with the movement of civilian and military vehicles or cargo from Guam.

Most recently, I joined my colleagues from the Hawaii Congressional delegation in expressing our concerns to and seeking funding assistance from Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in response to the proposed reduction in inspection and trapping services at and around Guam military and civilian ports by up to 50 percent this November. These operations, which are run by APHIS Wildlife Services, annually interdict 6,000-7,000 snakes. Since the DOD benefits significantly from such operations, and is expected to increase its own presence in activities and movements to and from Guam as much as three times in the next five years, it is imperative that all military operational expansion and construction planning on Guam should include brown tree snake control and interdiction design measures and protocols. DOD should consider such funding as part of its base operational and readiness plans.

As background, the brown tree snake was accidentally introduced into Guam in the late 1940s and 1950s, likely via U.S. military cargo, from an area in the Pacific where the snakes are native. Unfortunately, because Guam had no natural predator but abundant prey, the brown tree snake population spread throughout the island.

Because the brown tree snake's preferred prey is birds, it is directly responsible for the extinction of 9 of 134 native forest birds and 3 of 12 native lizards on Guam. Economically, the snakes have caused more than 1,600 power outages over a 20-year period in Guam, costing the island $4.5 million per year without considering their impact on transformers, and damages inside electrical substations. The disruptions affect all aspects of everyday life in homes and work, as well as for the government and the business community.

In Hawaii, the brown tree snake represents one of the greatest terrestrial ecological threats due to its potential impact on our endangered bird species, which are found nowhere else on earth. As a result of Hawaii's geographical isolation and lush environment, there were more than 140 endemic bird species in the islands prior to human contact. Today, among the remaining 71 endemic forms, 30 are federally listed as endangered, and 15 of these are on the brink of extinction. Any negative impact on our native bird species in Hawaii will inevitably impact our native flora as well. Hawaii has the highest known number of endemic terrestrial plants of any major island group.

Economically, a University of Hawaii study estimates that the introduction of the brown tree snakes to Hawaii will cause between $28 million and $450 million annually in electrical power outages. This does not include the potential devastation to our agriculture industry. In Guam, the brown tree snake has contributed to the decline in production of the island's agriculture industry, particularly the commercial poultry industry, because the snakes eat eggs and chicks. The snake has also impacted the growing of fruits and vegetables because insects that are no longer naturally controlled by birds and lizards inflict increased damage on crops.

To address the brown tree snake problem, a Brown Tree Snake Control Committee was established subsequent to provisions in the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990. A multi-agency Memorandum of Agreement on Brown Tree Snake Control was also signed in 1992 and renewed in 1999. However, it expired in March of this year.

The Brown Tree Snake Control and Eradication Act will statutorily authorize a process to ensure the ongoing activities of federal agencies, enhance their effectiveness, provide the necessary resources from agencies actually conducting the work, and strengthen the coordination between federal and regional stakeholder in Hawaii and the Pacific in a more systemic fashion.

Among the authorized activities is the expansion of science-based eradication and control programs in Guam; the expansion of interagency and intergovernmental rapid response teams in Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Hawaii; the expansion of efforts to protect and restore native wildlife in Guam or elsewhere damaged by the brown tree snake; continuation and expansion of sustained research funding from the Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Wildlife Services, and National Wildlife Research Center, including the establishment of an APHIS, Wildlife Services, Operations Program State Office located in Hawaii; and the expansion of long-term research into chemical and biological control techniques that could lead to large-scale reduction of brown tree snake populations in Guam.

H.R 3497 is a product of collaboration between my office, the offices of Congresswoman BORDALLO and Congressman ABERCROMBIE, and the key Federal, State, and territorial stakeholders in the region. While the brown tree snake is just one of the more serious of many invasive species threats to Hawaii, the mechanisms strengthened and established under H.R. 3479 can serve as an exemplary model for addressing other invasive species issues, not just in Hawaii, but in our whole country.

The bill is supported by the Hawaii Department of Agriculture, the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, the Hawaii Invasive Species Council, the Nature Conservancy of Hawaii, the Coordinating Group on Alien Species, and others. Such coordinated support in Hawaii is illustrative of the seriousness that we take this issue and the assistance the federal government can anticipate receiving after enactment of this bill. Hawaii's stakeholders will not be silent and passive partners in this effort.

I am specially proud about the establishment of the Hawaii Invasive Species Council, which includes key State, county and Federal head officials in Hawaii, by legislation approved by the 2003 Hawaii State Legislature and Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle.

I understand that Hawaii is now only one of seven states in the country to establish such a council in addressing invasive species prevention and response measures at the State level.

Again, I urge my colleagues to support this important legislation.

arrow_upward