Repealing Mandatory Funding for State Health Insurance Exchanges

Floor Speech

Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Washington, DC

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT

Ms. WATERS. Mr. Chairman, my amendment requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to submit to Congress a report on the extent to which States are expected to have difficulties establishing health benefit exchanges without the Federal assistance repealed by this bill.

The Affordable Care Act requires the establishment of health benefit exchanges in every State. These exchanges will be a marketplace where individuals, families, and small businesses can purchase health insurance. The exchanges will feature a variety of health plans offered by different insurance companies, all of which must offer a comprehensive set of essential health benefits at affordable prices. The purpose of these exchanges is to enable American consumers to compare premiums, out-of-pocket expenses and benefits, and make informed choices among competing health plans.

The Affordable Care Act places an emphasis on State-based health reform. The Affordable Care Act allows States to set up their own health benefit exchanges and offers grants to States to assist them in doing so. A total of 49 States, the District of Columbia, and four territories have already applied for these exchange grants. These States and territories are working hard to determine what type of health insurance marketplace will be best for their families and businesses.

Without Federal funding, some States could have difficulty establishing exchanges in a timely manner. This could lead to poor management of the exchanges, fewer health plans included on the exchanges, and years of delay in getting the exchanges up and running.

Some States might simply refuse to establish exchanges at all in the absence of Federal assistance. This would result in greater costs for the Federal Government because the Affordable Care Act requires the Federal Government to set up health exchanges in those States that do not set up their own exchanges.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, States that attempt to set up health exchanges without Federal funding may face challenges in making their exchanges fully operational by 2014, as the law requires. These challenges could limit the desirability of the exchanges for consumers and reduce the capacity of some exchanges to process enrollment. As a result, CBO estimates that by 2015, there will be almost 2 million fewer people enrolled in State exchanges.

Many States are already facing declining revenues and budget pressures as a result of the Great Recession. Some States were forced to make painful choices, increasing taxes or cutting spending in order to make ends meet. Budget pressures have forced States to consider closing public health facilities, postpone transportation and infrastructure projects, and lay off teachers, law enforcement officers and other public employees. If the Federal Government expects States to set up health exchanges without any assistance, it will only compound their budgetary problems.

My amendment requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to report to Congress, within 6 months of enactment, on the difficulties States will encounter while trying to set up these exchanges without Federal help. If Congress is going to deny States the funding that was mandated for them to set up their health exchanges, Congress needs to know the extent of the difficulties States will face without these funds.

I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.

BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT


Source
arrow_upward