BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
The interview tonight is with the freshman senator who
wrote that letter about the public option. Sen. Michael Bennet of
Colorado.
Sen. Bennet, thank you very much for coming on the show.
SEN. MICHAEL BENNET (D-CO): Thanks for having me, Rachel.
MADDOW: What was your goal when you decided to write this letter?
Was the goal to get 50 senators to sign on?
BENNET: I think that would be great and that is one of the goals.
But the other thing was, it was happening at a time when I think there was
a view from some of the special interests in Washington that health care
was dead.
That view being reflected, by the way, and notices to
policyholders in California and other places raising rates by 40 percent
and 25 and 30 percent. But I just thought it was important to remind
people that we"re not dead yet.
MADDOW: There"s also a public option revival letter that"s
circulating on the House side, that effort being led by Chellie Pingree and
Jared Polis who is also from Colorado. How important was Jared Polis in
your decision to take charge of the effort in the Senate?
BENNET: Well, I think Jared is a great guy. He called me and told me
he had done the letter. It sounded like a great idea to me, and we started
circulating it.
MADDOW: In August of last year, Senator, you told the Colorado paper
"The Durango Herald" I think it was - that health reform shouldn"t hinge
on the public option even though you said you supported it.
I know you told "The Denver Post" that you didn"t think the
public option could pass. You told "The Durango Paper" that you didn"t
want to use it to draw a line in the sand on health reform. Do you feel
more strongly about it now than you did then?
BENNET: Well, I feel very strongly about it. I felt strongly about
then, and I feel strongly about it now. I don"t think anybody has got a
monopoly on wisdom on any of this stuff.
But I think the American people are looking for us. And
certainly the people in Colorado are looking for us to stop playing these
ridiculous political games, and actually start to solve the problems that
they"re facing every single day of their lives.
One of the great ironies, Rachel, to me about this debate is that
the people that are defending the current system and saying that somehow
this is a Bolshevik takeover of our health care system are defending a
system that every day is throwing thousands of people off private
insurance.
And they"re ending up in one of two places. If they"re poor
enough, they"re ending up on Medicaid, a public plan. If they"re not poor
enough, they"re ending up in the emergency room, getting uncompensated care
that all of us that are taxpayers are paying for and policyholders are
paying for.
They"re the ones that are defending a government takeover of
health care. It"s just the most expensive, least intentional version
imaginable. And I think we"ve got to keep fighting it to tell a story on
behalf of the American people that says, you know, it"s time to do
something different.
MADDOW: How does the public option fit into that, in terms of the big
picture of the - what you describe as the unwarranted criticism from the
right that this is some sort of Bolshevik takeover, the commitment on the
Democratic side to get something done. Where does the public option fit
into that in terms of importance and in terms of the basics of what
government is trying to do here?
BENNET: I think it is important for two particular reasons. One is
it injects competition into the system where, in too many parts of our
country, there is none.
And then, there"s the more practical reason, which is people are
saying to me - in my state, they"re saying, "Michael, if you"re going to
require us to have health insurance, then I"d like to have the broadest
array of options to choose from for my family. Let me decide what the
right thing for my family is."
As the father of three little girls, I certainly would like the
ability to make that decision myself. And fortunately, I don"t need to,
because I"m on a public option, just like all the people sitting around the
table the other day at the White House.
But for our families, you know, if you"re going to require them
to have insurance, they want to have all the choices. So I think it is
very important. I also think there are other components of health care
reform that are enormously important when it comes to costs and when it
comes to coverage.
And if there"s a combination of things that can help cover more
Americans, drive down our costs, increase our quality, I"m all ears to
everybody"s ideas. But I think the public option is one of the best ideas
that we"ve had so far.
MADDOW: Sen. Bennet, I should also ask you about something we"ve just
learned about - it"s just happened in the last few minutes. The bill that
was held up by Sen. Bunning all week to dramatic and strange effect has
finally passed, overwhelmingly, 78 to 19. What do you make of Sen.
Bunning"s actions here? What happened?
BENNET: Well, that"s a real nail biter, isn"t it? After a week
of holding up the work of the Senate, I can"t explain what he was doing.
It"s not the first time, by the way, this has happened. We had another
vote to extend unemployment insurance in the worst recession since the
Great Depression, 10 percent unemployment rate.
And people on average have been unemployed longer than ever. We
tried to extend unemployment insurance. It could have taken an afternoon.
Instead it took five weeks and the vote was something like 97 to zero or 98
to zero.
And we"ve been through another week like this, and all I can say
is that, you know, this place - I"ve been here for a year, and it does feel
a lot like "Alice in Wonderland." It doesn"t make any sense.
MADDOW: Sen. Bennet, I understand you"re going to announce a wide
ranging plan for some Congressional reforms, including some filibuster
reforms. You want a sneak preview of any of those for us?
BENNET: Well, I"ll just give you a little bit of it. I think, first
of all, that having things like the ability to do holds anonymously, where
senators don"t even need to step up in front of the American people and
say, "I"m the person that"s holding up a nomination or a piece of
legislation" - I think we should get rid of that.
I think we should think very seriously about how to reduce the
thresholds that are required when it"s clear that delay is the only thing
that"s happening. And I think, finally, that there"s some interesting
ideas about how to try - try to create some bipartisan effort around here,
around the filibuster.
So tomorrow, I"ll be talking about that and some other reforms,
including trying to make sure that members of Congress are banned from ever
being lobbyists in Washington.
MADDOW: Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado, a Democrat of Colorado, we
look forward very much to that announcement tomorrow. And I thank you for
joining us tonight. I appreciate your time.
BENNET: Thanks for having me, Rachel.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT