Stakeout Media Availability with Sens. McConnell (R-KY); Lott (R-MS); Cornyn (R-TX); Hutchison (R-TX) and Kyl (R-AZ) After Senate Policy Luncheon

Interview

Date: Nov. 13, 2007
Location: Washington, DC


Stakeout Media Availability with Sens. McConnell (R-KY); Lott (R-MS); Cornyn (R-TX); Hutchison (R-TX) and Kyl (R-AZ) Following the Senate Policy Committee Luncheon

Copyright ©2007 by Federal News Service, Inc., Ste. 500, 1000 Vermont Ave, Washington, DC 20005 USA. Federal News Service is a private firm not affiliated with the federal government. No portion of this transcript may be copied, sold or retransmitted without the written authority of Federal News Service, Inc. Copyright is not claimed as to any part of the original work prepared by a United States government officer or employee as a part of that person's official duties. For information on subscribing to the FNS Internet Service at www.fednews.com, please email Jack Graeme at jack@fednews.com or call 1-800-211-4020.

(BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT)

SEN. CORNYN (?): With $100-a-barrel oil, and gasoline prices going through the roof, you would expect that the leadership of Congress would be trying to do something to help bring down those prices at the pump for all Americans. Instead, what we see is no additional supply of oil and gas, no steps to try to increase refinery capacity to produce more gasoline, thus bringing down the price of gasoline at the pump. All we see is what can only be called a no- energy bill, that would do, as has already been suggested, raise taxes on the American people at the same time it would depress domestic oil and gas production and make us more reliant on imported oil from dangerous places of the world and enriching our enemies.

So my hope is that this week we'll begin to see some action on the floor to deal with this, and I suspect you'll see it coming from our side of the aisle, because the other side of the aisle has really been asleep at the switch.

(BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT)

SEN. MCCONNELL: We'll take a couple of questions.

Q Where are you on farm bill amendments? Will you -- (off mike)?

SEN. MCCONNELL: We've been talking -- Harry Reid and I have been talking about trying to get started here on some reasonable basis. Senator Chambliss and Senator Harkin have been collecting amendments, and we hope to be able to pare that list down and get started. I think there's a pretty broad bipartisan agreement that we would like to get the farm bill finished. I think it's highly unlikely to be finished this week, but we are going to try to get started with the amendment process.

Q Do you suspect there'll be a vote on Iraq funding this week, and do you expect that there will be any Republican support for the idea of a goal of withdraw by next June?

SEN. MCCONNELL: I would say that there will be minimum enthusiasm in my conference for passing the kind of bill on troop funding that we think the House is going to pass tomorrow. We'll have to wait and look at it, but if it is the kind of bill I anticipate it will be, it's not going to pass in the Senate this week.

Q In that case, what will your strategy be to get more money to the troops? The president's asked for more money.

SEN. MCCONNELL: Well, we'll be talking in the two weeks until we come back about the need to get the troop funding bill done. I'm going to rule 14 onto the calendar today the amendment Senator Stevens offered in the Appropriations Committee that would provide a clean funding for the troops, that would carry us over into next year. That's what we ought to pass. I'm going to put us in a parliamentary position to be able to vote on something in regards to that.

Q That will come this week, then?

SEN. MCCONNELL: Well, we'll see how it plays out.

Q (Inaudible.)

SEN. MCCONNELL: Probably.

Q And are you going to insist on 60 votes for passage or are you going to filibuster -- (inaudible) -- resembles what the House passed.

SEN. MCCONNELL: Yeah, I think we can stipulate once again for the umpteenth time that matters that have any level of controversy about it in the Senate will require 60 votes.

Q Senator McConnell, are you comfortable now with the amount of time -- (off mike) --

SEN. MCCONNELL: I'm sorry, I didn't hear the first part.

Q On the farm bill -- (off mike) -- comfortable with the -- (off mike)?

SEN. MCCONNELL: I'm not comfortable with the tree being filled up. I'm talking about a process under which the tree would no longer be filled up and we would start processing amendments in the way that I've been insisting on from the beginning.

Q Senator, should the AMT fix be paid for, and if so, how?

SEN. MCCONNELL: The AMT fix should not be paid for. This is a tax that's never going to be collected anyway. Why should we raise taxes on a whole lot of Americans?

Q Because that just presumes that that money would be collected.

SEN. MCCONNELL: Yeah, but that was a budget that passed without Republican support. We think it is a mistake to do what the House did last Friday, which was my first observation and I started the press conference, which is to raise taxes on a whole lot of Americans in order to prevent a tax increase that we all know is not going to clear anyway. We should have fixed the AMT many months ago, many months ago. Republicans are -- as Senator Kyl and others have pointed out -- been on record wanting a permanent AMT fix for years, and to use the need to fix the AMT as an excuse to raise taxes on a whole lot of other Americans is a bad idea, going to have limited, if no, Republican support.

Q Senator McConnell, Democrats released a report today saying the cost of the war will be higher than previous CBO estimates. I wondered, did you get a chance to see that? Could you comment on that?

SEN. MCCONNELL: We're grateful for the fact that we haven't been attacked again here at home for the last six years. Most of us don't think that's an accident or good luck or because we had the perfect defense. (Light laughter.)

Of course the war has been costly, but we have been protected from attack here at home. There's progress that is obviously being made in Iraq, being written about by most of your newspapers and outlets. And we need to finish the job, and finish the job is to leave Iraq in a condition that it can defend itself and be an ally in the war on terror.

Q Would an override attempt on Labor-HHS's veto be a waste of time?

SEN. MCCONNELL: I think we demonstrated last week on the conference report that we had more than enough votes to sustain a veto of the Labor-H bill.

Q As you take up the farm bill, has there been any progress in paring down the amendments today?

SEN. MCCONNELL: I think I've already covered that. We're in a process of collecting amendments, and we hope to have an open process where we can go forward.


Source
arrow_upward