May 3, 2007
Mr. Rex Tillerson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exxon Mobil Corporation
5959 Las Colinas Boulevard
Irving, Texas 75039-2298
Dear Mr. Tillerson,
For many years, I've been supporting and promoting ethanol and biodiesel fuels as a way to reduce our dependence on foreign and traditional energy sources, and increase our national security and rural economies. Our nation is now consuming five billion gallons of ethanol annually, and is estimated to produce as much as eleven billion gallons annually by 2009.
In an effort to further reduce America's oil dependence, it's imperative that higher ethanol blends be available to consumers. While our domestic auto manufacturers are leading the effort to expand the flex-fuel vehicle market, more must be done to expand the fuel's availability. Of the 170,000 stations nationwide, only 1,100 currently offer E-85. This represents less than one percent of fuel stations.
As you may recall, on March 14, 2006, you testified under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee. At the hearing, I asked if you would commit to allow independent owners of branded stations to sell E-85 or B-20, and if you would allow those station owners to purchase the alternative fuel from any outlet. For your benefit, I've enclosed a copy of the hearing transcript.
In your response to me, you stated that Exxon Mobil has denied no request from any dealers who sought permission to sell unbranded E-85. In addition, you stated that every request to sell the fuel under the canopy has been granted. Your testimony before the committee clearly stated that Exxon Mobil was perfectly willing to allow the sale of alternative fuels at Exxon Mobil stations. However, a recent Wall Street Journal article, which I've enclosed, detailed many of the obstacles your company and other major integrated oil companies apparently use to effectively prohibit or strongly discourage the sale of alternative fuels.
In fact, Exxon Mobil's standard contract bars Exxon stations from buying fuel from anybody but Exxon - a fact you chose not to disclose to the committee. It also appears that even in cases where exceptions are made, Exxon requires those station owners to install entirely separate dispensers, for the purpose of "minimizing customer confusion," according to an Exxon spokeswoman. It seems this policy has much more to do with limiting the availability of alternative fuels than customer confusion.
I would appreciate hearing your explanation as to why you led me, the Judiciary Committee and the American people to believe that Exxon Mobil supports making E-85 available to your customers, yet your company is described by the Wall Street Journal as a key obstacle to expanding the availability of alternative fuels. I would appreciate knowing exactly what Exxon Mobil is doing to grow the E-85 market, and why you believe your tactics aren't simply obstacles, as claimed by the Wall Street Journal.
I look forward to receiving your response not later than May 25, 2007.
Sincerely,
Charles E. Grassley
United States Senate