BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mrs. HOUCHIN. Mr. Speaker, last month, back home in Sellersburg, Indiana, Silver Creek High School's baseball team made history by winning the program's first-ever class 3A State title.
It is truly an honor and a privilege to recognize Silver Creek High School on the House floor. This is not only an impressive victory, but a testament to the guidance and leadership of Coach Joe Decker and his coaching staff who worked diligently to mold these young men not only into State champions--but future leaders.
I hope Coach Decker enjoys this well-deserved retirement.
The players' countless hours of practice, preparation, and teamwork has finally paid off and will, without a doubt, inspire future generations of players and coaches to strive for both excellence and good sportsmanship. They have not only made their school proud but the entire community and their Congresswoman.
Mr. Speaker, I look forward with great anticipation to see what they will accomplish next.
I congratulate them, once again, on their first-ever State championship win. I am sure it won't be their last. Activist Proposals at the SEC
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mrs. HOUCHIN. Mr. Speaker, as a member of the House Financial Services Committee, a member of the ESG Working Group, and the Representative of the Ninth District of Indiana, I can say with certainty that we need the Securities and Exchange Commission to be transparent and accountable to the American people.
In my work with committee, one issue I have been particularly focused on is the shareholder proposal process. In the current system, activists can persistently resubmit similar far-left proposals year after year despite those proposals being previously rejected by a majority of shareholders.
This shift in focus toward advancing environmental, social, and political policies distracts from the primary purpose of our public markets which is to enable companies to raise capital, foster economic growth, and provide a return on investment for everyday investors.
The SEC's recent proposals would make this problem worse by allowing more and more politically motivated shareholder proposals to be considered.
This busy work provides no benefit to business.
So why would we allow these already decided upon political topics to plague our boardrooms?
It is simply not fair to companies, including the ones across my district, to have to continuously invest resources in fighting or litigating activist proposals that clearly do not benefit the company or its shareholders, especially when similar proposals have already been rejected.
The SEC proposals defy logic and sound investment strategy. That is why last week I introduced the No Expensive, Stifling Governance Act, or the No ESG Act, as the very first bill of its kind to be introduced in Congress.
The No ESG Act would stop this burdensome rule from being enacted and help put an end to redundant and onerous shareholder proposals.
More specifically, for companies listening back home, this would address the SEC's proposed amendments on rule 14a-8.
While the current system benefits a small group of activists over everyday investors, this proposed rule would increase the burden on shareholders and businesses and divert attention away from the issues that actually matter.
The bottom line is that southern Indiana companies shouldn't be forced to become political platforms where politics overshadow sound financial decisionmaking.
When I said that my priority was to improve the financial landscape for the Ninth District, I meant it. Accomplishing that depends heavily on putting forth legislation that would make a real difference, and the No ESG Act is that kind of legislation.
I am glad to be contending on behalf of the State of Indiana to solve this problem that has been overlooked for far too long.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT