BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mr. ZELDIN. Madam Chair, I claim the time in opposition to the amendment.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mr. ZELDIN. Madam Chair, I stand in opposition to the amendment offered by my dear colleague, Mrs. Torres, that prohibits the President from removing any items listed in categories 1, 2, and 3 of the U.S. Munitions List.
One of the first Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee hearings this year was a review of a large interagency process to modernize the United States Munitions List to ensure the State Department retained oversight over only the most critical defense articles with military end-use.
The decision to transfer certain defense articles and services from State to Commerce had strong, bipartisan support but got caught up in a debate that had nothing to do with export control reform.
The process to move certain defense articles has already begun. In fact, here are just some of the categories of weapons that have already moved to Commerce licensing controls: launch vehicles and missiles, explosives, military aircraft, submersible vessels, tanks, and the list goes on. Once again, these defense articles have already moved to Commerce control.
This rule change should be finalized. After years of input from both sides of the aisle to make the change from State to Commerce, there is no reason this decision, which started in the last administration, needs to be delayed any longer.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mr. ZELDIN. Madam Chair, I continue to reserve the balance of my time.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mr. ZELDIN. Madam Chair, it is important to point out that not all firearms will move to Commerce. The State Department will continue to retain oversight for certain firearms: fully automatic firearms; modern artillery; silencers, components, parts, and accessories specially designed for automatic firearms and shotguns. The list goes on. It is actually a long list of firearms-related components that will stay on USML.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mr. ZELDIN. Madam Chair, the USML and the CCL are for listed exports of firearms. This jurisdictional transfer does not govern the illicit transfer of firearms that are often used in violent crimes and human rights abuses overseas.
The U.S. Government will continue its longstanding end-use modernizing efforts, including vetting of potential end-users, to help prevent human rights abuses.
As I stated during my opening remarks, when assessing Commerce's ability to take over this responsibility, it is hugely important to recognize everything that Commerce is already now in charge of, including, as I mentioned earlier, launch vehicles and missiles, explosives, military aircraft, submersible vessels, tanks, and the list goes on.
This is not a new function for Commerce. It is a transition that started years ago during the last administration. This new rule should be finalized.
What shouldn't be lost in this debate is how effectively Commerce is handling this responsibility with all the very important parts and categories that have already moved to their Department.
Madam Chair, I urge all of my colleagues to oppose this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Mr. ZELDIN. Madam Chair, I demand a recorded vote.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT