BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
HAYES: Joyce Vance and Elizabeth Holtzman, thank you so much. Joining me now is Democratic Congressman Joaquin Castro of Texas, a member of the House Intelligence Committee. And Congressman, as sitting on that committee which has been doing its own investigations both in the minority and now in the majority, your reaction to the judge finding that Manafort did in fact lie particularly about his interactions with Kilimnik.
REP. JOAQUIN CASTRO (D), TEXAS: You know, the fact that he lied is not a surprise. But to me this is much more serious than even the lying to Congress or lying to the FBI. Because remember, this like aim when he had already made struck a plea agreement. So all he had to do was meet certain conditions and they were going to ask that his sentence probably be reduced somehow or his cooperation be taken into consideration.
But there was something that was so important and valuable to Paul Manafort in lying that he went ahead and did it. And so as a member of the Intelligence Committee, I would like for us to find out what that was.
HAYES: Did you -- to speak to the thoroughness of the House Intelligence Committee`s Investigation under the stewardship of the Republican majority, how close did you guys come to uncovering just some of the information that we`re learning here?
CASTRO: Not very close at all. You know, the tragedy of the last two years of this investigation under Devin Nunes is there wasn`t a single subpoena that was issued for phone records or bank records, travel records, anything that would verify or discount what was told us by the witnesses. So we`ve still got a lot of work to do when it comes to putting all these pieces together.
HAYES: As someone who`s on the Intelligence Committee and this all started as essentially a counterintelligence probe, we kind of know that there were red flags going up and people concerned that essentially Russian intelligence was trying to co-opt or compromise members of the Trump campaign.
What do you make of these sort of three -- there`s now three different instances in which Russian associates or people linked to Russian government or intelligence are approaching the Trump campaign with a plan to lift sanctions. The Russian adoption meeting in Trump Tower which is of course about lifting sanctions. Those sanctions would have led to the end of Russian adoptions. This with Konstantin Kilimnik around a peace plan for Ukraine and the peace plan that was floated to Michael Cohen and delivered into the president`s White House we think perhaps to Michael Flynn. What does that say to you?
CASTRO: Well, you`re right and you asked a great question. And I think for most of the American public what we saw was the interference in terms of Facebook ads and so forth with the 2016 election and that`s what we think about as a Russian operation to affect or interfere with our elections and that was a full-court press.
But what we also see was that there was a full-court press of human intelligent agents or people with connections to the Russian intelligence agencies who were obviously targeting the Trump campaign to get something out of them. It looks like one of the things they were trying to get out of them was a relief from sanctions. And you know what we need to figure out is just how successful they`ve been and how much the Trump campaign and Trump associates have cooperated with them.
HAYES: All right, Congressman Joaquin Castro on the House Intelligence Committee, thank you very much.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT