BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
HAYES: On Saturday, Trump unveiled what he casts as a compromise to end the shutdown though he did not consult with any of the relevant parties with whom he would be compromising. The President deals instead hammering out between himself, his vice-president, and his own son-in-law. What Trump offered in exchange for $5.7 billion for his border wall was temporary protections for a limited number of formerly protected immigrants, immigrants the Trump administration itself has taken steps to throw into limbo. The far right greeted the proposal as some grand betrayal. Ann Coulter tweeting, "Trump proposes amnesty. We voted for Trump and got Jeb."
Remember, Trump reversed course and insisted on this shutdown in order to appease Coulter and others on the far right, which prompted Democratic lawmaker Jackie Speier to plead with Coulter to give Trump permission to reopen the government, although no luck just yet.
Mitch McConnell, for his part, plans to bring Trump`s offer up for a vote this week, although he said that the deal has to be worked out with Democrats and the White House. And it`s exceedingly likely to get the 60 votes necessary to pass the Senate.
Not a single Democratic lawmaker has said they support Trump offer, and the party remains unified around a very simple message: stop holding the American people hostage and reopen the government, and then we can negotiate.
Joining me now for more on where the Democrats state, Congressmen Joaquin Castro, Democrat of Texas. The president basically give us the money, the $5.6 -- $5.7 billion, and we will temporarily protect a variety of classes of immigrants that we have put in jeopardy, Haitians with temporary protected status, Hondurans and DACA recipients. What`s your response to that?
REP. JOAQUIN CASTRO, (D) TEXAS: Well, the first thing is that it wasn`t a serious offer. First of all, basically every part of that proposal was rejected last year. And as you mentioned the president is holding hostage the paychecks of hundreds of thousands of government workers in order to get a wall that most people in America, and in my state of Texas, don`t want.
And so he should reopen the government. We should be able to reopen the government as the senate voted -- a Republican senate voted to keep it open in December and then the House voted in January on the same thing -- we should be able to reopen the government and then negotiate.
And also, Chris, people have been asking, well, what`s the compromise? Well, if you think about it, the purpose of a border wall is for border security. So we know that adding a border wall to these rural areas of the border is not the most effective strategy. In fact, this past week we saw, I think it was 376 migrants tunnel under a portion of the border wall and then present themselves to CBP officers to be considered for asylum.
So the compromise, I think, is more money for border security that doesn`t include a wall, including technology that would be anti-tunneling technology to detect these kinds of things.
HAYES: OK. So, if that`s the compromise, though, then there`s two messages here, right. Because right now Democrats are saying there is no compromise. We will not be taken hostage. This is an unreasonable
approach to governing. Open the government based on the bills that pass the senate
unanimously and are out in the House and they`re just sitting there, and then we`ll talk about whatever you want to talk about. That`s one position.
The other is, some kind of deal where we do border security, but not the wall and that`s what we strike to get the government reopened. Which is it?
CASTRO: No, I think that we should reopen the government and then we can talk further about border security.
HAYES: And that`s the position of the Democratic caucus. And are there cracks in that if we go into -- I mean, people are in real trouble, obviously, federal workers and also there`s food inspections not happening, environmental sites are going without being inspected, national parks being torn to shreds. I mean, is there a point at which the cracks start to show up in the Democratic caucus?
CASTRO: Well, a rational, reasonable president would not be doing this. And the problem that we have is that they`re going to be other things like the debt ceiling that will come up, and the budget again. And so if you show Donald Trump that he can -- if you affirm to him that he can hold you hostage for $5 billion for a wall, then he will probably do it again when the debt ceiling comes up or when the next budget comes up, and that`s the problem.
HAYES: Right. So you see it -- and this is something that I`ve been told by numerous Democratic lawmakers on both sides of Capitol Hill, it`s almost existential, like you cannot negotiate under these conditions, because the incentives for what it produces from the White House going forward are just untenable.
CASTRO: Yeah, I mean, this is somebody who once he finds a way to get his way, even though the overwhelming majority of people disagree with him, he will keep going back to that. And that`s the danger here.
HAYES: So, I want to get your reaction to this threat tweet of his. He says, "no, amnesty is not part of my offer," the president. "It is a three year extension of DACA. Amnesty will be used only on a much bigger deal, whether immigration or something else" -- I don`t understand that -- "likewise, there will be no big push to remove the 11 million plus people who are here illegally, but be careful, Nancy."
Do you read that as a threat to start to move to deport the 11 million people here?
CASTRO: Well, I think that it`s a threat that he`s already tried to deliver on. He tried to go after the DACA recipients, the Dreamers, and the courts have held him up.
HAYES: Right.
CASTRO: So yeah, I think he would continue to do that, absolutely. He`s tried to go after the TPS holders, for example, again, it`s in the courts. So, yes, I think the president is intent on churning up his deportation machine and he`ll keep at it.
HAYES: How much communication is there inside the Democratic caucus on the House side about holding the line on this? Because the speaker has to hold together a big new majority caucus. It`s the first thing she`s doing. How much are you talking to leadership? How much are they talking to you?
CASTRO: Almost every day, especially when we`re in Washington. Folks are talking to each other. You know, it`s tough, especially for the freshmen members that have just come in, some of them have never served in an elected position before. So, it`s a very strange position
HAYES: Or in an open government.
CASTRO: Yeah, that`s right. It`s been closed down since they came in in January.
So yeah, I mean so I think that`s kind of tough. But I think we`re doing what we need to hold the line there.
HAYES: I haven`t seen any cracks myself. Joaquin Castro, many thanks.
CASTRO: Thank you.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT