BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
MADDOW: That`s today on the floor of the Senate.
Joining us now is Democratic Senator Chris Coons of Delaware. He`s a member of the Judiciary Committee in the Senate.
Senator Coons, I know this is an incredibly intense and busy time. Thanks for being here.
COONS: Thank you, Rachel. Great to be on.
MADDOW: As we head into this overnight and tomorrow morning with this first vote schedule at 10:30 a.m. Eastern, what are you expecting?
COONS: Well, I don`t know what to expect tomorrow. I think that the cloture vote hangs by a few undecided votes. There are I think at this point one Democrat and three Republicans who haven`t publicly declared their intentions for tomorrow. And since the Senate is divided so closely, 51-49, it may be a close outcome.
But frankly, what I`m also hoping comes out of this week, out of this pause for an FBI investigation is what I was speaking about on the floor earlier today, which is the message to the thousands of survivors of sexual assault who have come forward to my office, to many other offices, to tip lines across the country or to speak to family or friends for the first time, that we will enter a new phase in our country in terms of our willingness to hear and to respond to allegations.
I know there has been a lot of fighting this week about whether the process was fair to Judge Kavanaugh, whether the investigation was serious and thorough, and whether Dr. Ford and Debbie Ramirez had their allegations thoroughly enough investigated, and I look forward to getting into that.
But as larger point, I just wanted to say up front, Rachel that I`ve been stunned by how many people, people I`ve known for decades or just years or who I`ve just met have shared with me really powerful stories of their own experience, not seeking something, just wanting to be heard and wanting to be valued and wanting to share these private personal painful burdens they`ve carried for so long.
MADDOW: Do you feel like the Senate did right, particularly by Dr. Ford, but also by Deborah Ramirez and other people who came forward, specifically with stories to tell they said about Brett Kavanaugh?
Obviously, there has been a lot of controversy today over what has been described as the results of this FBI expanded background investigation, a lot of public reporting that indicates that people who those women in particular said should be followed up with by the FBI who could offer corroborating information, the FBI didn`t want to hear it, was not open to hearing from those corroborating witnesses. We then had a lot of Republican senators say confidently well, there was no corroborating information in the FBI report.
COONS: Well, first, let`s look at where we were a week ago. We were barreling ahead with a likely confirmation vote for Judge Kavanaugh without my friend Senator Jeff Flake stepping forward and changing and the course of where we were headed. Judge Kavanaugh would already be seated as Justice Kavanaugh for most of this week. So, I do think something important was accomplished by showing that we could listen to each other and we could take a time-out in order to have the FBI question and then deliver to the Senate some more facts around the core allegations.
I am not satisfied with the scope of who was questioned. I expected that there would be follow-on investigations questioning of corroborating witnesses so that, for example, if Debbie Ramirez was questioned and at the end of her questioning, she said here`s a dozen people who can offer corroborating testimony, I had expected that those sorts of interviews would take place. I know people have contacted my office, many other Senate offices who were trying to get to the FBI who were offering to be interviewed and who were not interviewed.
MADDOW: Senator, you mentioned your friend Republican Senator Jeff Flake and there has obviously been such a hot spotlight on him this week because of the way he`s publicly wrestled with this nomination and with issues of the FBI investigation and the pace of the nomination as you just described. I know that you`ve been in close contact with him through at least some of this process. I don`t want to ask you to betray any confidences.
But can you tell us anything about where he`s at in his process and what his ongoing concerns may be or if he has made up his mind?
COONS: I can`t, and if I knew, I wouldn`t betray his confidence. I can simply say this, that he is someone who because of our friendship and because of some of the stories he had heard and because of the testimony and because of the way he saw the judiciary committee being torn apart right in front of us, he listened to his conscience and took a lot of abuse from folks in his own party for insisting on this week pause. And I think that was an important contribution here.
But to be clear about inspections, Jeff`s a conservative. He would like a conservative justice on the Supreme Court. I`m not a conservative and I would not like a conservative justice on the Supreme Court. We have different views of jurisprudence and different views of which direction the court should go in its future interpretation of the Constitution. But if I were to look at this and imagine how he might be looking at this, questions that we`d be bringing or I`d be bringing to the table wouldn`t be about ideology, because the president has lots of other credentials conservatives from whom he can choose.
I would be looking at questions of judicial temperament, given the very sharp and partisan screed that Judge Kavanaugh unleashed on us in the Judiciary Committee. He was understandably angry, feeling he was unjustly accused. But there was a piece of argument to us that I think crossed the line into partisanship.
Former justice, former Republican and Justice John Paul Stevens withdrew his support from Kavanaugh today publicly because of the partisanship he showed in that defense. And then second, I`d be looking at questions of truthfulness. Whether or not in testimony to committee, Judge Kavanaugh shaded the truth or was untruthful about a number of things. You know, I frankly think when we get into details about words in his yearbook and what they meant, we lose the average American.
But when he made definitive statements to staff attorneys or to the committee, I did know this at this point, I didn`t know it at that point, I`ve done this before, I have never done this before, and there is evidence that puts that into question, then I think we have to have a conversation about truthfulness.
So to me, fitness and truthfulness sit on top of this underlying body of evidence of sexual assault allegations where after I reviewed the evidence in front of the committee today, I still have unanswered questions.
MADDOW: And as you say, separate and apart from any ideological consideration.
I do just have one last question for you, Senator, before I let you go, and that is that there has been lots and lots of rumors. Obviously, this is a fast developing news story tonight. Every reporter within smelling distance of the beltway is working everything they possibly can to figure out what`s going to happen tomorrow.
COONS: Yes.
MADDOW: Is it your sense there may be any other Republican senators who are seriously considering wrestling with how they might vote, or is it your sense that Senators Murkowski and Collins and Flake are really the only ones who are at all even open to the possibility of voting no tomorrow?
COONS: I have -- I`ve had a number of conversations with friends and colleagues just to sort of put forward my views on what`s happened and why I`m comfortable voting against Judge Kavanaugh tomorrow, but I could not say in any appropriate public way that they are undecided about what to do tomorrow.
I do know that there are members who had -- who paused after Dr. Ford`s testimony, which was compelling and who wrestle with the apparent contradiction between Judge Kavanaugh`s certainty that he did not commit a sexual assault and Dr. Ford`s compelling testimony that she was a victim of sexual assault by Judge Kavanaugh, and there are colleagues who have wrestled with how to reconcile that.
My hope is that they look beyond just the materials that were in front of us today from the FBI, but also consider some of the folks who tried testify to the FBI but were not able to and have now had their reports made public or who are seeking to talk to senators. Frankly, in the end, the FBI was not going produce a conclusion to us. They were just going give us fax. We`re the decision-making and senators I know are wrestling with their vote tomorrow, I think it will be a very close vote and I know it will be very closely watched which is appropriate, because we look to the Supreme Court as the guarantor of our constitutional liberties in this country.
MADDOW: Democratic Senator Chris Coons of Delaware, showing your well- deserved reputation both for comity, c-o-m-I-t-y, and discretion, and your ability to cross the aisle in dealing with your colleagues. Thank you for helping us to understand the state of play tonight, Senator. Really appreciate it.
COONS: Thank you, Rachel.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT