BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
HAYES: Until very recently the Secure Election Act seemed like a sure thing, a bipartisan bill with the sole purpose of protecting our voting systems from interference. Republican Roy Blunt who was the chairman of the powerful Senate Rules Committee, was set to mark up the bill on Wednesday, with the expectation of a full Senate vote in October. That markup never happened. No explanation was given as to why, until yesterday when Yahoo! News reported the bill had, quote, "been held up in the Senate at the behest of the White House, which opposed the proposed legislation."
The White House then told Yahoo! News that while the administration, quote, "appreciates congress`s interest in election security, the Department of Homeland Security has all the statutory authority it needs to assist state and local officials to improve the security of existing election infrastructure."
Lead Democrat on the bill, Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, joins me tonight. What happened here?
SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR, (D) MINNESOTA: It was a shocker, Chris, because the bill was going so well. Senator Lankford and I introduced the bill, and he`s still devoted to getting it done. As you know, he`s a conservative Republican from Oklahoma, and Senator Blunt in good faith set the hearing.
So what we heard was there was objections from Republican leadership in the Senate and then some Republican secretaries of state.
I talked today with the head of the Secretary of State Association, the Vermont secretary of state who`s a Democrat, and he wants to work to get this done.
We also of course had the White House making calls. I heard this personally. From some senators. And then I think the statement pretty much backs it up. Not only did they say the part you that read, but they also said "we cannot support legislation with inappropriate mandates or that makes -- moves power or funding from the states to Washington for the planning and operations of elections."
So Chris, what the bill does is it just creates incentives by saying you`re not going to get federal money for your election equipment unless you go to backup paper ballots, and nine states only have partial paper ballots, five, including New Jersey, don`t have them at all. And that is why a lot of us bipartisan felt that we should have that requirement in place if they wanted to get the federal money as well as require audits so we can check up on all of this later.
We are under attack by a foreign government, and we have to respond.
HAYES: So two things that are strange here. One is the White House will oppose legislation all the time. I mean, that`s a thing that happens. It happens under Democratic control, Republican control, but there`s a weird kind of shadiness here. The White House could have just issued a statement where they said we don`t like this bill, or they could have been public about it, but instead Blunt just kills it out of nowhere and then finally when asked about it they release a statement. Was that weird to you?
KLOBUCHAR: It was, although I will tell you, even the night before Roy Blunt called me and he`s trying to get this thing put together, we`re going to continue to work on this.
I felt like there may have been influences with the Federalist Society, you name it. I have no idea. But it felt like they were pushing back because of some attempt to put best practices into law so we can -- at least if we`re going to help the states since Maine and North Dakota and Arkansas cannot protect themselves from a Vladimir Putin cyberattack, then we put some best practices into law.
I still think we have a chance to move forward. I wish they`d been more forthright and certainly done it early on, because Lankford and I have had this out there for a year with Senator Kamala Harris and Senator Graham, Senator Burr and Warner support the bill. This is a major effort.
And so we just have to get this done with 74 days before the election.
HAYES: So, here`s the thing, this is the kind of legislating that I think there was more common as sort of an older model of how congress works, which I think has changed in lots of ways. And the White House comes in and they basically nuke it.
But you know, you`re a co-equal branch of government. Roy Blunt doesn`t take orders from the White House. Roy Blunt is a United States senator and he`s a powerful member of the Senate. You guys could just pass the thing, I mean, if you like it.
KLOBUCHAR: Let me get to the problem here. We had the votes, that`s true, with Senator Blunt`s support, but we didn`t have the Republican support we needed on the committee, not to pass it but to then pass it on the floor.
And we needed Senator McConnell to bring it up on the floor. So now we`re going back, negotiating again. Practically, we want to get this done more than score a political point.
HAYES: All right, speaking of sort of bipartisan legislating, I want to ask you a question about someone you`re close to, John McCain, the senator from Arizona, of course, whose family announced today that he will be refusing any subsequent medical treatment for his cancer and thanking all the people that have cared for him. And I`m just wondering as someone who`s worked with him, who considers him a friend, your thoughts about Senator McCain today.
KLOBUCHAR: Well, this was heartbreaking today. And my husband and I went to visit John and Cindy a little over a month ago. And I`m telling you, he still had his humor, this irascible spirit. And he is someone that so many times has showed this incredible independence. And for me, he is a mentor. He went with me and took me on a trip to Asia where it was all filled with men in every room and he would always say when they would turn to Lindsey, he would say Senator Klobuchar is the ranking Democrat on this trip. She will go next.
And he is someone that has done that for so many members of the senate, so our heart goes out to them right now. And this is a terrible, terrible disease as Cindy mentioned to me when we communicated in the past week. And we`re just hoping against hope that something changes. But right now it seems like a very difficult situation.
HAYES: You just said something that Chris Murphy said earlier today, and it`s something I think I didn`t quite have as clear a picture on is his role in mentoring members of the U.S. Senate when they get to the Senate,
whether they be Republican or Democrat.
KLOBUCHAR: Exactly. And he was willing to go on bills with me and has been willing like that Honest Ads Act about taking on the social media companies.
And he`s done that so many times, where, you know, for some of us on the Democratic side sure, he takes positions we don`t agree with, but many times mentoring is introducing people to things, taking them around the world so they understand, including conservative Republicans. How wemust work with the rest of the world, being strong on immigration reform, being out there taking on the mean-spirited rhetoric of the Trump administration. He has been a true leader for this country.
HAYES Senator Amy Klobuchar, thank you very much for making time tonight.
KLOBUCHAR: Well, thank you.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT