BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
MELBER: Right. Exactly.
I want you both to hang on. I want to turn, because a congresswoman just got in place, California congressman Maxine Waters joins me.
Congresswoman, I wonder your view of this push by your colleagues in the Senate and why now?
REP. MAXINE WATERS (D), CALIFORNIA: Well, I`m so very pleased that my colleagues in the Senate, led by Blumenthal, I`m told, organized and they are showing support for Mueller. And they are saying the justice department has a responsibility to protect him and allow this investigation to go on.
We are all worried. We are all worried and we are on break. You know, I`m here in California. And some of my colleagues thought that he might try this while we are all break. And so he has in many ways, you know, alluded to his dislike of Mueller. Keeps saying there was no collusion. This investigation needs to stop. And so many of us wonder if he is not guilty, why is he doing what he has been doing, firing and undermining and basically causing this chaos if he is innocent?
And so I`m very pleased. You know, I organized 100 and I believe it was 80 members of the Democratic caucus to basically sign a letter in support of Mueller. And I did that in September, because again, we are very concerned that this President is capable of doing anything and that he may try it.
MELBER: Congresswoman, as you know, one of the things that Steve Bannon does is make up probabilities. He will just say there`s a 22 percent chance that something is happening like it means something. It sort of his rhetorical techniques. So I want to read to you one of his probabilities here.
This was published in "Fire and Fury." He was telling people there was a 33 percent chance Mueller`s investigation would lead to impeachment, a 33 percent chance Trump would resign, and a 33 percent chance that he would limp to the end of his term.
I don`t know if you and Steve talk a lot and you speak in the same probabilities that he does. But do you think? Is there still, in your view, based on the public facts, a 33 percent chance of impeachment or higher?
WATERS: I don`t know what percentage chance to give it except to say this. That I believe that Mueller will connect the dots. And I do believe that he is impeachable. And I do know that if he crosses certain lines, like the firing Mueller, that puts him in a position where even Republicans may ride to the occasion and accept their responsibility. And there may be other things that we don`t know about.
I have started, you know, this conversation early on right after he was sworn into office. And I learned a lot about his allies and their connection to Russia and the oligarchs, et cetera. And so I have continued to talk about this President being unworthy and should be impeached. And I know that you have to have the facts. The dots must be connected. But I believe it is certainly can be done. And if anybody can do it, Mueller can do it.
MELBER: And congresswoman, I want to play for the benefit of your response, there are critics, some Democrats including yourself, who argue that whatever one`s disagreements with Donald Trump that that may bias the higher legal standard and the constitutional standard, as you know for the potential removal of a President in office. And so, I want to play for you and then get your response. This was you making that type of claim against the Republicans pursuing bill Clinton in that impeachment, take a look.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
MELBER: Your argument is that it was despicable because it was partisan and not a proper exercise of the constitutional impeachment power. What do you say to people who argue that the Democrats in the House may go down that road? May go down that road depending on what happens in November because of a distaste for Donald Trump?
WATERS: Well, I want to tell you that the Democrats have been very, very responsible. And even saying to me that I should not be calling for impeachment. Let the investigation go on. Let Mueller connect these dots. And they have not taken a position as a Democratic caucus on this impeachment.
And they have said to me, that let`s just talk about our issues. Let`s not talk about him, just this -- this just emboldens the Republicans who say that the only reason that you would want impeachment is because you don`t like him and that you lost the election. And so, Democrats have been terribly responsible. And again, I`m one of just a few who have insisted that he is unworthy, that he is deplorable, that he is despicable and he should be impeached.
MELBER: Congresswoman, stay with me, if you will. I`m juggling and I want to include the panel that has been sitting by with us.
Mike Lupica, take a listen to the White House answering. I think the question that may sound embarrassing to them but was just a real question, which is with all the lawyers heading out the door, who is lead counsel for the President in this open criminal probe. Take a listen.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
MELBER: Right. And the question is, is whether Michael Cohen has been aggressive enough? And that brings me to a final question I want to ask you, congresswoman Waters, on a related matter, which is we are seeing more women come forward and not only speak out against these financial threats from the President of the United States, which as we reported has never happened before, never has a sitting President tried to find, of course, to fined women millions of dollars for speaking,
But number two, we are seeing these new suits of them saying that the President`s people, Michael Cohen as a longtime aide, are defaming them by calling them liars for speaking about their alleged history with Donald Trump. What do you think is the import of that and that as a legal strategy?
WATERS: Well, you know, I`m very pleased that, you know, the women are showing up. First of all, I don`t hear any real discussion about the $130,000 payment. Why was that payment made if that in fact nothing happened? If he had no contact with them, if he does not know them, he was going to sue them. And finally this suit has come out that is ridiculous and nobody really believes that it pays any attention to him in his attempt to sue Stormy.
But the fact of the matter that he has lied, he has said he had no contact, it was not an affair, yet, why was $130,000 paid? Did his attorney just somehow, you know, discover that maybe something happened and maybe I better go and find some money and maybe I better go pay off this woman to keep her quiet? It`s ridiculous.
And they know, these women know, that he is guilty of the kind of accusations that we have been hearing about so much in me too and what`s happening in Hollywood. Why should he escape? Everybody else that`s been pointed to and been accused have had to account for it or they are having to account for it.
MELBER: Congresswoman Maxine Waters, thank you as always for sharing your time and perspective with us. And my thanks to Mike Lupica and Natasha Bertrand.
WATERS: Thank you.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT