Dear. Mr. Dodaro:
The ongoing opioid epidemic highlights the urgency for Congress to consider all means available to combat the production and trafficking of illicit narcotics and precursor chemicals, which are on the rise in many Western Hemisphere countries. Illicit drugs have caused many American deaths and contributed to horrible violence for our communities. Six of the top ten countries with the highest murder rates in the world this year are in the Western Hemisphere.
The Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (Kingpin) became law in 1999, and it has been used to target individuals and organizations involved in drug trafficking. A Kingpin sanction leads to the blocking of a designated individual's or entity's property and assets, prohibition on U.S. transactions, the denial of U.S. visas, and other criminal and civil penalties. In addition, Executive Order 13581 and Executive Order 13773 address transnational organized crime and criminal networks. Since its inception, Kingpin has led to hundreds of individuals and entities being sanctioned. As of October 2017, there were 915 individuals, 831 entities, and one aircraft listed under the Kingpin Act (SDNTK sanctions program). Of that total, 110 were designated as "Tier 1," representing the most significant threat and concern, and of those, 65 individuals and 16 organizations were connected to countries in the Western Hemisphere.
Evidence from Congressional oversight efforts has revealed that since Kingpin became law nearly two decades ago, there has been no comprehensive impact study on its effectiveness other than a one-time Judicial Review Commission on Foreign Assets Control report published in 2001. Since that time, criminal networks have adapted to U.S. and regional counternarcotics actions, and Kingpin has been applied more globally. Kingpin sanctions also affect U.S. businesses, increasing their operating costs. Thus, it is essential to consider lessons learned in the Western Hemisphere to ensure that Kingpin achieves its intended impact, is coordinated with other U.S. counternarcotics tools, does not unduly burden U.S. businesses, and leads to lasting results.
Therefore, we ask that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct an impact study to review the effectiveness of Kingpin that includes an examination the following:
1. Assess if there are ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the interagency process and information-sharing between the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Department of State, Department of Justice and U.S. interaction with foreign government partners, including in targeting local facilitators and enablers in partner countries;
2. Examine the impact Kingpin has had on drug trafficking organizations and networks and on drug flows in the Western Hemisphere, including through its 50% Rule, and ways to improve Kingpin's implementation and statutory authorities; and
3. Consider the value of cross-designations to determine whether multiple U.S. designations (under Kingpin, terrorist sanctions programs, and other transnational criminal organizations designations) more effectively enable U.S. and foreign partners to bring criminal charges against drug traffickers in U.S. and foreign jurisdictions than individual designations.
We also very much hope that GAO's review of the Kingpin Act will inform the work of the independent U.S. Western Hemisphere Drug Policy Commission. If you have any questions, please contact our staff: Maria Sierra (Senator Cassidy, 202-224-5824), Rebecca Ulrich (Rep. Cook, 202-226-9980), Tim Rieser (Senator Leahy, 202-224-7284), and Sadaf Khan (Rep. Sires, 202-225-7919).
Sincerely,
Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D.
Committee on Finance
Col. Paul Cook, Ret. (CA-08)
Committee on Foreign Affairs ~ Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Western Hempisphere
Senator Patrick Leahy
Vice Chairman
Committee on Appropriations
Albio Sires (NJ-08) Ranking Member
Vice Chairman
Committee on Appropriations
Committee on Foreign Affairs ~ Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere