BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Speaker, an Iran with a nuclear weapon would
present an existential threat to Israel, destabilize the region and
undermine U.S. security interests. This agreement is our best option
for avoiding such a scenario. If Congress rejects this agreement, there
is a high probability Iran will continue developing weapons grade
plutonium and uranium.
That could result in American military action--something I believe we
should avoid--and that the American people oppose. A U.S. strike would
be costly, causing loss of life on both sides--and could lead to
attacks on Israel. Yet, it would only postpone Iran's nuclear weapons
development by a few years.
Clearly, a strong, enforceable diplomatic solution is superior. Let's
be clear--this agreement is enforceable. The monitoring and inspection
provisions are more intrusive than any previous agreement. Most
importantly, they will prevent Iran from producing fissionable material
without the international community knowing.
There are some who suggest that even with this agreement Iran might
still acquire nuclear weapons in the long term. While some provisions
of this agreement are indeed time limited and the world will need to
revisit this issue, this agreement remains our best chance of thwarting
the immediate threat. Many estimates suggest Iran is two to three
months away from acquiring a nuclear weapon--and this agreement
addresses that very imminent threat.
Mr. Speaker, I have heard from constituents on all sides of the
issue. I respect the opinions of those who do not support it. However,
I believe this agreement is our best option.
Support the agreement. Vote yes.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT