Rating Group: Humane World Action Fund

1999-2000 Positions

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.


results per page:
State Office Name Party Rating
Earl Pomeroy 38%
Rob Portman 38%
Nick Rahall II 38%
Silvestre Reyes 38%
Dana Rohrabacher 38%
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen 38%
Jim Saxton 38%
VA U.S. House - 3 Bobby Scott Democratic 38%
TX U.S. House - 17 Pete Sessions Republican 38%
Norman Sisisky 38%
MS U.S. House - 2 Bennie Thompson Democratic 38%
Karen Thurman 38%
Marion Berry 25%
Mary Bono Mack 25%
Leonard Boswell 25%
Richard Burr 25%
CA U.S. House - 41 Ken Calvert Republican 25%
Dave Camp 25%
Saxby Chambliss 25%
Eva Clayton 25%
Thomas Coburn 25%
Robert Cramer 25%
James DeMint 25%
John Dingell 25%
John Duncan, Jr. 25%
arrow_upward