Rating Group: Humane World Action Fund

1999-2000 Positions

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.


results per page:
State Office Name Party Rating
Mary Landrieu 40%
Tom Lantos 75%
Stephen Largent 25%
CT U.S. House - 1 John Larson Democratic 100%
Tom Latham 25%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Rick Lazio 75%
James Leach 88%
Patrick Leahy 60%
CA Mayor Barbara Lee Democratic 100%
Carl Levin 75%
Sandy Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 25%
John Lewis 75%
Ron Lewis 13%
Joe Lieberman 80%
Blanche Lincoln 20%
John Linder 13%
William Lipinski 100%
Frank LoBiondo 63%
CA U.S. House - 18 Zoe Lofgren Democratic 75%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Nita Lowey 88%
OK U.S. House - 3 Frank Lucas Republican 13%
Ken Lucas 25%
arrow_upward