Rating Group: The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

2007 Positions

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.


results per page:
State Office Name Party Rating
John Tierney 87%
Ed Towns 87%
NY U.S. House - 7 Nydia Velázquez Democratic 87%
CA U.S. House - 43 Maxine Waters Democratic 87%
Diane Watson 87%
Lynn Woolsey 87%
John Yarmuth 87%
Evan Bayh 85%
Joe Biden, Jr. 85%
Hillary Clinton 85%
Daniel Inouye 85%
MN U.S. Senate - Sr Amy Klobuchar Democratic 85%
Blanche Lincoln 85%
Barack Obama II 85%
Jay Rockefeller IV 85%
Ken Salazar 85%
NY U.S. Senate - Sr Chuck Schumer Democratic 85%
Jim Webb, Jr. 85%
Gary Ackerman 80%
Jason Altmire 80%
Marion Berry 80%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 80%
Bruce Braley 80%
Mike Capuano 80%
Mike Doyle, Jr. 80%
arrow_upward