Card image cap

Tina Posterli's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Key


Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.

Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.

Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.

Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.

Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.

Tina Posterli has provided voters with clear stances on key issues by responding to the 2024 Political Courage Test.

What is the Political Courage Test?

New York State Legislative Election 2024 Political Courage Test

Pro-choice a) Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
Yes b) Do you support legalizing abortion when the pregnancy resulted from incest or rape?
No c) Do you support the prohibition of public funds (e.g. Medicaid) for organizations that perform abortions?
No a) In order to balance the budget, do you support limiting state government spending on social programs (e.g. SNAP, TANF)?
No b) Do you support a decrease in income taxes in order to promote economic growth?
Yes c) Do you support a wealth tax in order to pay for public programs in your state?
No d) Do you support the implementation of congestion pricing in New York State?
While fiscal responsibility is important, focusing on maintaining and improving the efficiency of social programs rather than cutting them could balance the budget without harming vulnerable populations. Cutting income taxes could reduce state revenues, leading to cuts in essential services like education, healthcare and infrastructure. It's crucial to balance tax reductions with maintaining necessary funding for programs that benefit all residents. Income tax cuts could work under certain conditions, provided they are targeted and don't undermine our state's ability to fund critical services. It's important to assess the potential long-term impact on both economic growth and social equity. The wealthiest individuals often accumulate wealth through capital gains, investments, and assets that are taxed at lower rates than earned income. A wealth tax could address this disparity, ensuring that those who benefit most from the economy contribute a fair share to support public services. However, it's important to design the tax in a way that is fair, enforceable, and doesn't push wealthy individuals or businesses to leave the state. I support Governor Hochul?s decision to delay the implementation of the congestion pricing plan. Our policies need to evolve to address the needs of the challenges faced by constituents and changing demands of our business landscape. This is an opportunity for New York State to reassess its strategies to ensure they effectively address our environmental and transportation goals.
No a) Do you support capital punishment for violent crimes?
Yes b) Should an individual under 18 accused of a violent crime be prosecuted as an adult?
Yes c) Do you support the enforcement of federal immigration laws by state and local police?
No d) Do you support the use of private prisons?
No e) Do you support mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offenders?
I think capital punishment should be reserved for the most extreme cases of violence, such as terrorism or mass murder. Further, I think it should only be considered in cases where there's no doubt about the guilt of the accused, and after ensuring the legal system is free from bias. I believe in juvenile cases, it's important to evaluate each case individually, balancing the need for justice and public safety with the potential for rehabilitation. While private prisons can operate at a lower cost than government facilities, which can free up taxpayer funds for other services and may help manage overcrowding in public prisons, the profit motive may create incentives to keep incarceration rates high. There is a limit to what our prison system is able to accommodate, and most drug offenders end up back on the streets, perpetuating the cycle. Reforming drug policies to prioritize rehabilitation and reduce recidivism is necessary to work toward having an impact, rather than solely focusing on punitive measures.
Yes a) Do you support state government spending as a means of promoting economic growth (e.g. grants, tax incentives)?
No b) Do you support reducing state government regulations on the private sector (e.g. for business or the environment)?
Yes c) Do you support an increase of the minimum wage in New York?
Yes d) Do you support government spending on affordable housing projects in New York?
Yes e) Do you support prohibiting non-compete agreements from employers in New York State?
State government spending can lead to job creation by providing funding for infrastructure projects, workforce development, and supporting local businesses. Investments in community projects can boost local economies, improve quality of life, and generate additional tax revenue in the long run. However, it's important to have strong accountability and transparency processes in place for how funds are allocated and spent and sustainable economic policies that not only provide short-term boosts but also create long-term growth and stability for communities. Regulations often play a critical role in protecting public health and safety. Reducing these regulations may lead to negative consequences, such as environmental degradation, unsafe working conditions, or health risks for consumers. In addition, certain environmental regulations are necessary for long-term sustainability and the protection of natural resources. Striking a balance between economic growth and environmental protection is essential for future generations.
No a) Do you support adopting federal education standards (e.g. Common Core) in New York?
No b) Do you support state funding for charter schools?
Yes c) Do you support increasing teacher salaries AND/OR benefits in New York?
No d) Should immigrants in the United States who graduate from New York high schools be eligible for in-state tuition at public universities, regardless of immigration status?
I'm an advocate for policies that create pathways for undocumented immigrants to gain legal status, which can further support their ability to access education and employment, and I support the creation of scholarship programs or financial aid options specifically for undocumented students, ensuring that they have opportunities to pursue higher education.
Yes a) Do you support state funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
No b) Do you support state governments allowing permits for drilling on public lands?
Yes c) Do you support increasing state funding for clean drinking water initiatives?
No d) Do you support the establishment of the Home Energy Affordability Transition (HEAT) Act?
New York has the potential to maintain and even enhance its energy availability through a diverse mix of renewable sources, energy efficiency initiatives, and technological advancements. With the right policies and investments, New York can build a sustainable and resilient energy future without relying on drilling. This transition not only ensures energy security but also contributes to environmental protection and public health. Regarding the HEAT Act: Although I agree with adopting legislation to plan for the phase out of fossil fuel infrastructure for energy and heating needs, shifting to renewable energy requires significant upgrades to the current energy infrastructure and a plan in place to ensure a stable energy supply during a transition period. I would be fully supportive of this act after adjustments to address these concerns effectively are made.
Yes a)Do you support limiting campaign contributions from corporations, unions, and individuals?
Yes b) Do you support the use of an independent or bipartisan commission for redistricting?
No c) Do you support requiring a government-issued photo identification in order to vote at the polls?
Yes d) Do you support automatic voter registration?
No e) Do you support the implementation of ranked choice voting in New York?
The importance of a fair and transparent electoral process cannot be overstated. I'm an advocate for the need for policies that promote equitable representation and that reduce the influence of money in politics, ensuring that all voices are heard in the democratic process. I support transparency in the redistricting process, regardless of whether it is conducted by a commission or the legislature. This includes opportunities for community input and clear communication about how maps are drawn. I support the use of technology and data analysis to inform the redistricting process, ensuring that decisions are based on objective criteria rather than partisan interests and encourage regular reviews of district maps to ensure that they remain representative of changing populations and communities. I favor redistricting processes that promote fairness, transparency, and community representation and oppose gerrymandering practices that undermine democratic principles. I support the potential of automatic voter registration to enhance democratic participation and streamline the electoral process, but strong privacy protections and data security measures must first be in place to address concerns about personal information and regular assessments must be done to ensure these systems are functioning effectively. Before implementation, it would also be crucial to build robust public awareness campaigns to inform citizens about AVR, how it works, and our rights regarding registration and opting out.
Yes a) Do you generally support gun-control legislation (e.g. red flag laws, closing the boyfriend loophole)?
Yes b) Should background checks be required on gun sales between private citizens at gun shows?
Yes c) Do you support the right to concealed carry in New York?
While I do not oppose the right to concealed carry, I support comprehensive regulations surrounding concealed carry permits, including thorough background checks, training requirements, and the need for individuals to demonstrate a legitimate reason for carrying a concealed weapon. I am also an advocate for places where guns should not be allowed, such as schools, hospitals, and public transportation.
No a) Should the state government increase funding for treatment facilities to combat opioid abuse?
No b) Do you support a government-run (e.g. single-payer) healthcare program such as Medicare-for-All?
Yes c) Should an individual have the right to choose to die (e.g. those with a terminal illness) through euthanasia?
Yes d) Do you support mandating vaccinations (e.g. for school or employment)?
Yes e) Do you support expanding paid family AND/OR medical leave benefits (e.g. maternity leave)?
Yes f) Should the government be able to regulate the cost of prescription drugs?
While I understand that opioid addiction is a public health crisis and funding for treatment facilities can enhance access to care and improve outcomes for those affected by addiction, increased funding could divert resources from other critical areas such as education or infrastructure. I am an advocate of a public-private partnership model between the state government and private organizations or nonprofits to expand access to treatment without placing the entire financial burden on the state. A single-payer program would provide equal access to healthcare that is desperately needed, but NY is not ready at this time to transition to a single-payer system, which would require a significant overhaul of its healthcare funding structure. The state would need to raise substantial revenues through taxes, likely in the form of increased income or payroll taxes, to replace the current system of private insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs. Transitioning to a single-payer system would take planning and time, as it involves restructuring the entire system, potentially leading to disruptions in care during the transition period. While I support vaccine mandates in schools and healthcare-based settings, I believe employers outside of these sectors should be able to implement their own guidelines for vaccinations.
Yes a) Do you support inclusion of sexual orientation in New York's anti-discrimination laws?
Yes b) Do you support the inclusion of gender identity in New York's anti-discrimination laws?
Yes c) Do you support greater efforts by New York's state government in closing gender, racial, and other wage gaps?
I'm running to fight for our schools' fair share of foundation aid, to ensure all our students get a quality education. I've been working with families on the ground since the initial cuts proposed in the state's budget earlier this year. I garnered meetings with Education Committee leaders and families who would be impacted. And it was our families who worked so diligently to fight against these cuts and have our aid restored. But a formula for aid will likely determine that our district's schools will be in jeopardy next budget cycle once again. Less foundation aid for schools impacts us all. It means districts need to either raise local property taxes or reduce education services to compensate for funding shortfalls. Another one of my priorities is to secure funding for much-needed infrastructure to protect our communities from flooding and flooding impacts. This is especially vital in the wake of Hurricanes Milton and Helene and with the upcoming 12-year anniversary of Superstorm Sandy. On the Long Beach City Council, I pushed forward over $200 million in infrastructure investments and brought long-needed flood protections to our north shore and grants to reengineer our sewage system to stop the discharge of millions of gallons of effluent into Reynolds Channel each day. This type of funding is also important because it can help to lower our taxes.

Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.

arrow_upward