Card image cap

Jared Lovelace's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Key


Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.

Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.

Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.

Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.

Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.

Jared Lovelace has provided voters with clear stances on key issues by responding to the 2024 Political Courage Test.

What is the Political Courage Test?

Texas Congressional Election 2024 Political Courage Test

Pro-life Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
Yes Do you support the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade?
I believe that life begins with a heartbeat. A woman has her God-given agency to do whatever she wants, but killing babies is immoral and wrong. The only justifiable case for an abortion is as a life-saving medical operation to save the life of the mother when the child cannot be saved in the process. I am against giving the federal government power to pry into or monitor the lives of women and their reproductive statuses. Any ban on abortion should target the medical practice and industry of abortion. Women who suffer miscarriages should not be at risk of coming under federal investigation for losing their baby. Ultimately, people who kill babies will be held accountable by God. The federal government will not be able to stop 100% of abortions despite passing laws.
No Do you support expanding federal funding to support social safety net programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
Yes Do you support a decrease in income taxes in order to balance the budget?
No Do you support a wealth tax in order to pay for public programs?
We must balance the budget. I will not approve raising the debt ceiling or pass continuing resolutions. I will not vote in favor of any budget that does not reduce the deficit by at least 10%. I am in favor of simplifying the tax code and lowering income taxes overall, so that everyone pays in something. I would support a flat tax or fair tax. The biggest issue in balancing the budget is reigning in congressional spending. We must prioritize where are tax revenues are spent. Massive social programs are not sustainable. We must make sacrifices in order to preserve the future freedom and prosperity of America. The national debt is a sleeping giant that will one day destroy our country and seize our rights.
Yes Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations, unions, and individuals?
The current campaign finance system robs the people of their power in elections. It is impossible to remove money entirely from the political process, but money should not determine the outcome of our elections. An incumbent should feel pressure to return to their district to attend forums, townhalls, and events that are open to the public (AKA their constituents) and NOT just spend all their time with elite and donor circles.
Yes Do you support protecting government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
People should not view targeting public officials as an opportunity for self-enrichment via civil lawsuit. If something criminal was done by the public official, then a criminal investigation and trial should handle the case. Public officials need to be held accountable for following the same laws as everyone else, but civil cases against them rob the public of hard-earned tax dollars.
No Do you support increasing defense spending?
Not until the budget is balanced. We need to cut wasteful spending within the department of defense and cease fighting proxy wars across the planet. We need to focus on national defense and freedom of navigation for U.S. commerce, not conflicts between foreign countries. There is sufficient funding currently to build a stronger Navy, Air Force, and Space Force if we focus less on "woke" agenda items and useless overseas wars. Once the budget is balanced, we can address reasonable increases to defense spending.
No Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth (e.g. grants, tax incentives)?
No Do you support the federal government increasing funding for affordable housing programs?
No Do you support the federal government taking action, beyond those of the Federal Reserve, to alleviate inflation?
I'm a big believer in the free market. Less government spending and involvement is better.
No Do you support the forgiveness of federal student loan debt?
This is wasteful spending. This robs students of the opportunity to work hard and conditions them to expect free handouts. Not everyone needs a college degree. Applying sound personal finance principles are more than sufficient to pay down college debt. Paying for a degree should be considered a financial investment into one's future earning potential. Giving students a free ride to study whatever they want will dilute the incentives of the free market to study what will actually get them a good job.
Yes Do you support requiring a government-issued identification in order to vote at the polls?
This is common sense. Anyone who is against requiring a government-issued identification to vote is putting our country at risk of infiltration by foreign actors. Non-U.S. citizens should not be voting in U.S. elections. U.S. citizens should not be voting multiple times in an election.
Yes Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
Yes Do you support the federal government allowing permits for drilling on public lands?
The current climate agenda is corrupt and hypocritical. I am in favor of funding modest levels scientific innovation. We need to be energy independent, but also have a diverse portfolio of energy options to add resilience to the U.S. energy grid amidst geopolitical and natural weather events. We need the freedom to use Earth's resources, but I am in favor of protecting the environment from negligent waste, spills, over harvesting, etc.
No Do you generally support gun-control legislation (e.g. red flag laws, boyfriend loopholes)?
The federal government's job is to protect the second amendment, not regulate it. I am against all gun-inhibiting legislation at the federal level.
No Do you support a government-run (e.g. single-payer) healthcare program, such as Medicare-for-All?
No Do you support expanding paid family AND/OR medical leave benefits (e.g. maternity leave)?
No Should the government be able to regulate the cost of prescription drugs?
Less government regulation is better. We need to protect the free market.
Yes Do you support increasing security along the southern US border?
Yes Do you support requiring immigrants to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship, regardless of their immigration status?
I support the rule of law. Anyone that enters legally and follows the law is welcome to pursue the American dream.
No Do you support economic intervention as a means of resolving international conflicts?
No Do you support the US providing increased offensive military aid to Ukraine?
"Economic Intervention" is a fancy way of saying sending cash and weapons to foreign countries to fight their wars. No, I do not support sending money and weapons to foreign countries to fight their own wars. We have too many issues at home at need our precious tax dollars and attention. U.S. Foreign Policy needs to break its tradition of hypocritically marching to the anthem of "Democracy First" and start focusing on "America First".
No Do you generally support increased regulations on social media companies (e.g. Tik Tok, Facebook, etc.)?
This is a very complex issue, but free speech must be protected. Private companies can set their own terms and conditions. The federal government should look closely at whether or not the largest social media companies meet the definition of "monopoly". If so, breaking up these companies into smaller ones to increase competition and decrease any single company's power over national social discourse would be a more appropriate regulation.
My first priority is to defend the border. My second priority is to balance the budget. The border is a matter of national defense and should be considered an emergency. Sufficient spending on border defense should be written into law and not subject to annual appropriations. The budget deficit and $34 trillion national debt have also reached the proportions necessary to consider a national emergency. Congress must make sweeping cuts to federal spending, or we will not have a country for our children to inherit. I will not pass any continuing resolutions or raise the debt ceiling. If the government must shut down, then we must do it to force the financial accountability and change that our country so desperately needs.

Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.

arrow_upward