On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House (CT) - District 1
For Presidential and Congressional candidates who refuse to provide voters with their positions, Vote Smart has researched their public records to determine their likely responses. These issue positions are from 2022.
| Pro-choice | Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation? | ||
|
|||
| I have a plan to solve the issue in a way that 80% of people will accept. I intend to codify "therapeutic" (medically necessary abortion including rape) as a federal right. Then I will leave "elective" abortion (the use as a contraceptive method) for the states to determine. I am a physician and I understand this issue extremely well. It is not a yes/no question. | |||
| No | Do you support expanding federal funding to support social safety net programs such as Social Security and Medicare? | ||
| There is plenty of money already in play. The problem is that this money is mis-spent. I will use evidence-based outcome measures and data to determine what works and what does not work. I will REMOVE administrative bloat and P4P from Medicare. I will REMOVE the PBMs. Then we will see the same money work like never before. | |||
| Yes | Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations,unions, and individuals? | ||
| I support ELIMINATION of campaign contributions from corporations and unions. I intend to completely reform campaign finance. I would like to see term limits so that "getting money" is not the main goal of candidates from day one. | |||
| No | Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct? | ||
| Nobody is above the law. Misconduct needs to be addressed. And the liability belongs to the INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE not to the taxpayer. Why should the taxpayer fund a settlement against a department when the fault lies with the person who was in the wrong? | |||
| No | Do you support increasing defense spending? | ||
| I support a very strong military with cutting edge weaponry. I do NOT support endless proxy wars, which is where most of our defense spending currently is spent. Take some of that and tend to our Vets. No to proxy wars. Yes to military might. | |||
| No | Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth? | ||
| Yes | Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19? | ||
| No | Do you support the federal government taking action, beyond those of the Federal Reserve, to alleviate inflation? | ||
| Spending money never did alleviate inflation. Quite the opposite, in fact. | |||
| No | Do you support the forgiveness of federal student loan debt? | ||
| Paying off federal loan debt is only going to encourage the universities to continue their inflated and predatory pricing. I suggest that if a student cannot pay his debt, that the UNIVERSITY SHOULD PICK UP THE TAB. Then we will see how quickly they provide a good education and an affordable price. | |||
| Yes | Do you support requiring a government-issued identification in order to vote at the polls? | ||
| I run a methadone clinic. My patients are often homeless and shooting up straight fentanyl. THEY HAVE AN ID. Voter suppression does NOT come from IDs. Voter suppression comes from two parties that give us two horrible choices that nobody wants to vote for. This disenfranchises about half of US registered voters already. What is the point of a free and fair election when the candidates are simply mouthpieces for unelected party structures? | |||
| Yes | Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)? | ||
| Yes | Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions? | ||
| ONLY by ways that are proven and do not unjustly harm the poor or punish people for breathing. We have FREE and SIMPLE ways to decrease greenhouse gases, but the feds want to impose top down crony plans so they can trade in carbon credits while they fly their private jets to Davos. No. We need to plant trees, improve zoning, improve housing, make cities walkable, do composting, and many other things. Forcing people to buy a Tesla or eat bugs are "bad ideas." I prefer "good ideas." | |||
| Unknown Position | Do you generally support gun-control legislation? | ||
|
|||
| I support 2A and will not take away guns. Even so, I will consider proven measures that will reduce harm. But it has to make sense. Things like making LCMs very hard to get. Making people get a "shooting license" similar to a driver license would make sense. I have seen research about the causes of gun violence and it is really important to address those. Also I care about the urban kids getting murdered and want to end the school to prison pipeline. Common sense, limited legislation is constitutional. Does this work for my "well regulated milita?" | |||
| No | Do you support a government-run (single-payer) healthcare program, such as Medicare-for-All? | ||
| Yes | Do you support expanding paid family AND/OR medical leave opportunities? | ||
| No | Do you support lowering the cost of prescription drugs? | ||
| I would end Pharmacy Benefit Managers. This is why costs are so high and why mom n pop pharmacies are dying out. I would also end lobbying by corporations, so this problem will get much better much more quickly. I do not like the government to regulate the market. There are many other steps to take. I would also mandate that critical drugs are manufactured in the USA. Summary-insurance company PBMs are the cause of the problem. Clean house. | |||
| Yes | Do you support increasing security along the southern US border? | ||
| Unknown Position | Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship? | ||
|
|||
| I support immigration reform. This is much more than a yes/no question. I support penalizing companies that hire unlawfully under the table and I would reduce the incentives for unlawful entry, then I would secure the border and go to work evaluating cases as they come. Criminals are gone and will not return. | |||
| Yes | Do you support economic intervention as a means of resolving international conflicts? | ||
| No | Do you support the U.S. providing increased offensive military aid to Ukraine? | ||
| This is merely a way to give China improved hegemony in Asia. We are fighting a proxy war with Russia on the backs of Ukrainian men who are forced to fight. This helps China, and it also helps the global financial system. I support humanitarian aid. We spent more in the first 6 months of Ukraine war than we did in the first 5 years of our Afghanistan war, and we actually had boots on the ground at that time. Xi is pleased by a chastened Russia and open access to central Asia courtesy of US dollars. | |||
| No | Do you support raising taxes, on any income or on any entity, to promote economic growth? | ||
| Economic growth is not really promoted by increased taxation. Of that much I am sure. But I would SHIFT the tax burden from "earned income" (people's daily labor) to "skimmed income" (financial products and trades). We tax work too much. Everyone knows that whatever you will tax, you will get LESS of. That plays out in work just like any other product. | |||
| No | Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)? | ||
| Again this depends on the circumstance. Sometimes we have an uneven playing field. I support a strong AMERICAN economy and sometimes that will involve some regulation. Too much "trade" right now is in currency baskets and other financial products, and this is shifting the economic power in the world. I reserve the right to defend America financially. | |||
| 1-Viewpoint Discrimination Act (free)-Add the word "viewpoint" to CRA to make your viewpoint a Civil Right. 2-Election Reform (free)-The Enfranchise America Act would COMBINE access, transparency, and election reforms such as RCV and campaign finance reform and term limits into one PRO-Democracy bill. 3-Mental Health and Addiction (funded with savings from prisons, law enforcement, social services, medical)-mandate treatment in exchange for supportive housing communities that work. Also PREVENTING it through closing the achievement gap in under-resourced areas. |
Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.