Bob Lorinser has failed to provide voters with positions on key issues covered by the 2024 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests from Vote Smart and voters like you.
For Presidential and Congressional candidates who refuse to provide voters with their positions, Vote Smart has researched their public records to determine their likely responses. These issue positions are from 2024.
| Pro-choice | Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation? | ||
| I am an advocate of life and a proponent of choice, privacy, and individual liberty. I will support proven measures to reduce abortion Religious beliefs are the foundation of anti-abortion and my or your religious beliefs should not be the basis for the laws of our country. I can personally advocate for life and politically be pro-choice. These two positions are not mutually exclusive. In the end, the government should not serve as the decider on a woman's medical decisions or religious beliefs. If the goal is abortion prevention, making it illegal is ineffective. It only makes it more dangerous. | |||
| Yes | Do you support expanding federal funding to support social safety net programs such as Social Security and Medicare? | ||
| Taxes make society possible without such we will truly suffer. Health care, education, national defense and infrastructure aren?t free. If it is wanted and deemed a civic necessity then it needs to be paid for. We all should pay our fair share and the monies spent wisely for all of us. The problem is what is our fair share and can we agree on what to spend it on? I can say tax cuts for large businesses and the rich weren?t the answer. Taxes are ?the cost of a civil society? not a burden to bear. | |||
| Yes | Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations,unions, and individuals? | ||
| Campaign reform is absolutely necessary to protect our democracy. We need to protect �of the people, for the people, and by the people� not for or by the people of wealth. | |||
| Yes | Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct? | ||
| Yes but not absolute immunity | |||
| Yes | Do you support increasing defense spending? | ||
| I could have answered this either way. Spending will increase in dollars when our economy increases; but should the percentage of our economy on defense increase? Doesn't that depend on the current situation and the threats to our national security? That is why the budget is voted upon year after year. It all depends on the current situation. We need more health care dollars, sustainable Medicare and Social Security, and better infrastructure for Americans at home and they are competing for the same dollars. We also need national security. | |||
| Yes | Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth? | ||
| Yes | Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19? | ||
| Yes | Do you support the federal government taking action, beyond those of the Federal Reserve, to alleviate inflation? | ||
|
|||
| I can say tax cuts for large businesses and the rich aren't the answer. What was promised with the 1980 tax cuts, mainly for the rich, and repeated again in 2017 was ?trickle down? economics. That didn?t work but what did happen was $50 trillion transferred from the bottom 90% to the top 1%; a decrease in the middle class; marked decreases in competition; price gouging; choking out small businesses; an end to the most prosperous period of development America has seen: and wealth inequalities causing social unrest. | |||
| Yes | Do you support the forgiveness of federal student loan debt? | ||
|
|||
| Again--a difficult question, and one can answer it differently. Shouldn't every student graduate in each state have the ability to read and write? Shouldn't they be able to understand financing, civics, and more? What if several States disagree since they can't afford to provide what is needed for that student's success. Education is vital to America as its sole purpose is to prepare a better citizen and worker, both of which are critical to our nation's survival. So yes, depending on the federal standards I support. | |||
| No | Do you support requiring a government-issued identification in order to vote at the polls? | ||
|
|||
| Yes | Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)? | ||
| Yes | Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions? | ||
| Doesn't it depend on the purpose, benefits, and harms of such? Should we have regulations to make food and water safe to eat and drink? I think so. How safe and to what extent is the question, isn't it. Overregulation means "too much? while under regulation means "not enough" The "right amount" protects consumers and the environment and isn't a burden from an out-of-control 'nanny state'. It will save lives and benefit Americans far more than it cost. | |||
| No | Do you generally support gun-control legislation? | ||
| The question is inappropriately worded so I said no I support practical, common-sense, nonpartisan solutions that are backed by science and data anti-gun violence legislation that doesn't violate the principles of our way of life and our constitution. Yes I support anti-gun violence legislation | |||
| Do you support a government-run (single-payer) healthcare program, such as Medicare-for-All? | |||
| Do you support expanding paid family AND/OR medical leave opportunities? | |||
| Do you support lowering the cost of prescription drugs? | |||
| No | Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship? | ||
| Yes | Do you support increasing security along the southern US border? | ||
|
|||
| If the United States does indeed build a wall along its southern border and then monitors it effectively, it may succeed in curbing illegal immigration, but it will not end it. As long as life in the United States offers potential migrants more opportunities and fewer perceived dangers than in their home countries, illegal immigration will likely persist. The proposed wall on the U.S.-Mexico border?like all previous walls?should be viewed as a means to an end, rather than an end unto itself. | |||
| Do you support the U.S. providing increased offensive military aid to Ukraine? | |||
| Yes | Do you support economic intervention as a means of resolving international conflicts? | ||
|
|||
| No | Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)? | ||
| It should be fair trade, not free trade. The benefits need to be win-win: for the exporter and the importer | |||
| Economic viability enables us to thrive from jobs with living wages - if an adult is working a full-time job, they should not have to rely on food stamps. Affordable and accessible healthcare, as no one should suffer the consequences of not being able to afford or access medical care providers or their hospitals. Environmental Protection--As our Native American colleagues tell us, our decisions today should result in a sustainable world seven generations into the future. Protection of our Democracy, voting rights, and individual freedoms, including the rights of all minorities. Women's rights |
Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.