Card image cap

Martha Flores-Gibson's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Key


Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.

Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.

Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.

Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.

Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.

Martha Flores-Gibson has refused to provide voters with positions on key issues covered by the 2016 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests from Vote Smart and voters like you.

What is the Political Courage Test?
This candidate has responded to a Political Courage Test in a previous election. As a continued effort to provide the American public with factual information on candidates running for public office, these archived responses are made available here.

California State Legislative Election 2012 Political Courage Test

Pro-life a) Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
No b) Should abortions be illegal after the first trimester of pregnancy?
No c) Should abortion be legal when the pregnancy resulted from incest or rape?
No d) Should abortion be legal when the life of the woman is endangered?
Yes e) Do you support requiring parental notification before an abortion is performed on a minor?
Yes f) Do you support requiring parental consent before an abortion is performed on a minor?
Yes g) Do you support the prohibition of public funds for abortion procedures?
Yes h) Do you support the prohibition of public funds for organizations that perform abortions?
Women have rights and they have to be given to them, this is a very sensitive issue for all women

1) State Spending:Using the key, indicate what state funding levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one level per category; you may use a number more than once.2) State Taxes:Using the key,indicate what state tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one level per category; you may use a number more than once.3) Budget Stabilization:Indicate which proposals you support (if any) for balancing California's budget by marking Yes (Y) or No (N).4) Public Pensions:To mitigate California's public pension shortfall, do you support:

Slightly Increase a) Education (higher)
Slightly Increase b) Education (K-12)
Maintain Status c) Environment
Maintain Status d) Health care
Maintain Status e) Law enforcement/corrections
Maintain Status f) Transportation/infrastructure
Slightly Decrease g) Welfare
h) Other or expanded categories:
Maintain Status a) Alcohol taxes
Maintain Status b) Tobacco taxes
Maintain Status c) Corporate taxes
Maintain Status d) Gas/Oil taxes
Maintain Status e) Property taxes
Maintain Status f) Sales taxes
Maintain Status g) Income taxes (low-income families)
Maintain Status h) Income taxes (mid-income families)
Maintain Status i) Income taxes (high-income families)
Maintain Status j) Other or expanded categories:
No a) Tapping into California's "rainy day" fund
No b) Increasing tuition rates at public universities
Yes c) Reducing or eliminating public worker collective bargaining
Yes d) Reducing state employee salaries AND/OR pensions
Yes e) Instituting mandatory furloughs AND/OR layoffs for state employees
No f) Reducing benefits for Medicaid recipients
Yes a) Increasing contributions by current and future employees?
Yes b) Hybrid retirement plans that combine guaranteed and privately-managed benefits?
Yes c) Raising the retirement age for new employees?
Millions of Californian's would agree - raising taxes just kicks the can down the alley, and will allow the bureaucratic machine that is our state's capitol to continue its litigation, effectively ignoring the states structural problems. As a grandmother, I am equally troubled by how much money my grandchildren will owe the government before they can even graduate high school. Higher taxes have driven the gold out of California. As a result, Local governments and public school districts are on the chopping block, a steep price in the form of funding cuts. Indeed, a very gloomy horizon for California.
Cut Wasteful and Deficit Spending : Sacramento is trying to squeeze blood out of a turnip. The budget should be managed in a fiscally responsible way. Lawmakers should demand an aggressive audit to look for fraud/corruption in our state government. The audit should also ensure that no community is left underserve. The safety of the Californians should be the top priority, and by ensuring monies are spent correctly, it will stay that way.
I'm committed to stop the bleeding in the state budget, and is not afraid to go after special interests that are overlooked at budget cutting time. When it comes to taxes, I understands what normal citizens have been trying to let politicians know for years: No more taxes!

a) Do you support limits on the following types of contributions for state candidates?

No 1) Individual
No 2) Political Action Committee
No 3) Corporate
No 4) Political Party
Yes b) Should candidates for state office be encouraged to meet voluntary spending limits?
Yes c) Do you support requiring full and timely disclosure of campaign finance information?
Yes d) Do you support the use of an independent AND/OR bipartisan commission for redistricting?
Yes e) Do you support requiring a government-issued photo identification in order to vote at the polls?
f) Other or expanded principles:
Yes a) Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes?
No b) Do you support the California prison realignment program?
Yes c) Do you support alternatives to incarceration for certain non-violent offenders, such as mandatory counseling or substance abuse treatment?
Yes d) Do you support decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana?
No e) Should a minor accused of a violent crime be prosecuted as an adult?
No f) Should a minor who sends sexually-explicit or nude photos by cell phone face criminal charges?
Yes g) Do you support the enforcement of federal immigration laws by state and local police?
Public safety is the most essential and basic duty of government. Overcrowding and prison costs are real problems that cannot be ignored, I will completely reject the initiative her opponent supported (Prison Reform Bill ABX3) which will let 27,000 convicted criminals onto California streets. This bill does not separate violent from non-violent criminals and it has been discovered that felons convicted of human trafficking, stalking, identity theft, and violent child abuse would be among the eligible recipients of early release. Couple this information with the fact that California has a 70 percent recidivism rate and this bill is particularly troubling.
Yes a) Do you support reducing government regulations on the private sector?
Yes b) Do you support increased state funding for job-training programs that re-train displaced workers?
No c) Do you support expanding access to unemployment benefits?
Yes d) Do you support providing financial incentives to the private sector for the purpose of job creation?
Yes e) Do you support increased spending on infrastructure projects for the purpose of job creation?
No f) Do you support the high speed rail project between San Francisco and Los Angeles?
Yes g) Do you support providing direct financial assistance to homeowners facing foreclosure?
No matter how you look at it, or party you align yourself with, Sacramento has failed to create jobs and bring businesses to the Golden State. The Tax Foundation lists California 49th of all U.S. for its "business tax climate" and Chief Executive.net labels California as the worst state to do business in. Jobs are fleeing our state, and disinvestment occurred five times more in 2009 then in 2011. California has been voted the least-friendly state for small business : the sector of our economy that not only accounts for 70% of total job growth nationwide, also builds strong communities.
No a) Do you support the national Common Core State Standards initiative?
Yes b) Do you support a merit pay system for teachers?
No c) Is the tenure process for public school teachers producing effective teachers?
Yes d) Should parents be allowed to use vouchers to send their children to any school?
Yes e) Do you support state funding for charter schools?
Yes f) Do you support the state government providing college students with financial aid?
No g) Should illegal immigrants who graduate from California high schools be eligible for in-state tuition at public universities?
Sacramento recently passed the largest tax increase in California history, and schools still lost funding. As your assemblywoman, I would fight to get central government out of the way so that communities can more efficiently educate their children. It is time that the 70th district and California got a new voice, a voice that is committed to the people of this state instead of the special interest groups trying to serve themselves at the expense of schools. I'm that new voice, I more than anyone knows the needs and issues of the school system that she has served so long.
No a) Do you support state funding for the development of alternative energy?
Yes b) Do you support state funding for the development of traditional domestic energy sources (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil)?
Yes c) Do you support state funding for improvements to California's energy infrastructure?
Yes d) Do you support state funding for open space preservation?
No e) Do you support enacting environmental regulations aimed at reducing the effects of climate change?
I strongly believes that we must be stewards of our natural resources, and as your assemblywoman, I would fight to protect our environment. However, the policies supported by the establishment in Sacramento have made living in this state and doing business substantially more difficult, while failing to actually benefit the environment.
No a) Do you support restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns?
Yes b) Should background checks be required on gun sales between private citizens at gun shows?
Yes c) Should citizens be allowed to carry concealed guns?
No d) Should a license be required for gun possession?
e) Other or expanded principles:
No a) Do you support a universally-accessible, publicly-administered health insurance option?
Yes b) Do you support expanding access to health care through commercial health insurance reform?
Yes c) Do you support interstate health insurance compacts?
No d) Do you support requiring individuals to purchase health care insurance?
Yes e) Do you support monetary limits on damages that can be collected in malpractice lawsuits?
Yes f) Do you support allowing doctors to prescribe marijuana to their patients for medicinal purposes?
g) Other or expanded principles:
Yes a) Should marriage only be between one man and one woman?
Yes b) Should same-sex couples be allowed to form civil unions?
No c) Do you support the inclusion of sexual orientation in California's anti-discrimination laws?
No d) Do you support the inclusion of gender identity in California's anti-discrimination laws?
e) Other or expanded principles:
Keep Business in California and Create Jobs : increase business viability by cutting payroll and sales taxes for all business to encourage job growth. Economy should be fueled by small business, not bloated bureaucracy 2. Cut Wasteful and Deficit Spending : Sacramento is trying to squeeze blood out of a turnip. Lawmakers should demand an aggressive audit to look for fraud/corruption in our state government. 3.Education : We should place control of schools back into the hands of the parents, principals and teachers. Tuition and fees at the university and city college level should be fair and provide equal access.

Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.

arrow_upward