Card image cap

Kreed Kleinkopf's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Key


Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.

Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.

Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.

Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.

Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.

Kreed Kleinkopf has refused to provide voters with positions on key issues covered by the 2016 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests from Vote Smart and voters like you.

What is the Political Courage Test?
This candidate has responded to a Political Courage Test in a previous election. As a continued effort to provide the American public with factual information on candidates running for public office, these archived responses are made available here.

Idaho State Legislative Election 2012 Political Courage Test

a) Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
b) Should abortions be illegal after the first trimester of pregnancy?
c) Should abortion be legal when the pregnancy resulted from incest or rape?
d) Should abortion be legal when the life of the woman is endangered?
e) Do you support requiring parental notification before an abortion is performed on a minor?
f) Do you support requiring parental consent before an abortion is performed on a minor?
g) Do you support the prohibition of public funds for abortion procedures?
h) Do you support the prohibition of public funds for organizations that perform abortions?
I personally believe that abortion is wrong. I believe this divisive issue is used to divide and conquer the people of the US, forcing them to ONLY vote Democrat or Republican. I do not think our government should be involved in the doctor/patient relationship at all. People should think through their actions and hold themselves responsible for the choices they make in life. Government should not interfere with this, and should support a free society where people are allowed to make their own choices. If you are opposed to abortion, don't use the government to force your beliefs on others.

1) State Spending:Using the key, indicate what state funding levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one level per category; you may use a number more than once.2) State Taxes:Using the key,indicate what state tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one level per category; you may use a number more than once.3) Budget Stabilization:Indicate which proposals you support (if any) for balancing Idaho's budget.

Slightly Increase a) Education (higher)
Slightly Increase b) Education (K-12)
Slightly Increase c) Environment
Slightly Increase d) Health care
Slightly Decrease e) Law enforcement/corrections
Slightly Increase f) Transportation/infrastructure
Maintain Status g) Welfare
Slightly Decrease a) Alcohol taxes
Slightly Decrease b) Cigarette taxes
Slightly Decrease c) Corporate taxes
Slightly Decrease d) Gas/Oil taxes
Slightly Decrease e) Property taxes
Slightly Decrease f) Sales taxes
Greatly Decrease g) Income taxes (low-income families)
Greatly Decrease h) Income taxes (mid-income families)
Slightly Decrease i) Income taxes (high-income families)
No a) Tapping into Idaho's "rainy day" fund
No b) Increasing tuition rates at public universities
No c) Reducing or eliminating public worker collective bargaining
No d) Reducing state employee salaries AND/OR pensions
No e) Instituting mandatory furloughs AND/OR layoffs for state employees
No f) Reducing benefits for Medicaid recipients
This section assumes that government revenues will continue to rise. In the economic times we live in today, this is simply not the case. I believe with the ridiculous amount of money we spend on government services if we reduce administrative and bureaucratic costs of basic services, we can increase spending on actual services, without actually spending more money on them. With Idaho state revenue in decline, we need to vastly innovate our application of services we provide by reforming and abolishing dilapidated programs and replacing them with new, innovative approaches. Technology will help us with this process greatly.
Again, we can cut spending at the bureaucratic/administrative levels, while at the same time increasing the quality of the services government provides through innovation and technology. History has proven time and time again, that higher taxes do NOT increase government revenue. If there is more money for lower and middle class families to spend in our economy, our society could once again flourish all the while, with a more active economy, government revenues can stabilize to a level were services do not need to be cut drastically.
Idaho already has a balanced budget. We have done quite well not going into deficit spending in the past and I wish our federal government could take a lesson on this from our great state. I have one proposal, one thing relating to energy, that could not only save this state a great amount of money, but will revolutionize the world-wide economy and all this talk of cutting spending and benefits to people who need them will become obsolete. Please see www.facebook.com/kreed.for.idaho for more information!

a) Do you support limits on the following types of contributions for state candidates?

Yes 1) Individual
Yes 2) Political Action Committee
Yes 3) Corporate
Yes 4) Political Party
Yes b) Should candidates for state office be encouraged to meet voluntary spending limits?
Yes c) Do you support requiring full and timely disclosure of campaign finance information?
Yes d) Do you support the use of an independent AND/OR bipartisan commission for redistricting?
Yes e) Do you support requiring a government-issued photo identification in order to vote at the polls?
Yes f) Should the right to hunt, fish, and trap be incorporated into Idaho's constitution?
I believe campaign finance reform is one of the greatest issues our nation faces today. Campaign finance and the lobbying industry is the greatest source of government corruption. This corruption leads most young people to not even show up to vote because they think there is no difference in either candidate they vote for. In so many cases, the same corporations and PAC's donate money to opposing campaigns, and this leads people to think that their "representative" will go into office owing their contributors "favors". We should look into greatly reforming the system of campaign finance.
No a) Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes?
Yes b) Do you support alternatives to incarceration for certain non-violent offenders, such as mandatory counseling or substance abuse treatment?
Yes c) Do you support decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana?
Yes d) Should a minor accused of a violent crime be prosecuted as an adult?
No e) Should a minor who sends sexually-explicit or nude photos by cell phone face criminal charges?
Yes f) Do you support the enforcement of federal immigration laws by state and local police?
I think we should crack down on violent crime to person or property. Non-violent criminals are clogging up our court system, and causing a great expense to our state corrections system. It costs almost 3 times as much to incarcerate someone as opposed to providing them with a college education. My answer for e) should contain the words if it is non-consentual, then perhaps it should be considered a crime. I think too many activities are considered crimes in general, so I would like to not add to the penal code anymore than what is necessary for society to function.
Yes a) Do you support reducing government regulations on the private sector?
Yes b) Do you support increased state funding for job-training programs that re-train displaced workers?
No c) Do you support expanding access to unemployment benefits?
Yes d) Do you support providing financial incentives to the private sector for the purpose of job creation?
No e) Do you support increased spending on infrastructure projects for the purpose of job creation?
Yes f) Do you support providing direct financial assistance to homeowners facing foreclosure?
This section has a lot of false alternatives. I support government that supports strong economic growth. I also believe the economic problems we face are greatly due to the inflation caused by out of control government spending. We have plenty of money to provide government services and expand job training, financial services to businesses and individuals. The US spent $454 Billion Dollars on Interest on the national debt alone last year. This is on a total debt of 15.2 Trillion dollars. Our debt is projected to pass 23 Trillion dollars by the year 2015.
No a) Do you support the national Common Core State Standards initiative?
Yes b) Do you support Idaho's shift to an increased emphasis on technology in the classroom?
Yes c) Do you support a performance pay system for teachers?
No d) Do you support eliminating tenure for new teachers?
No e) Should teachers' collective bargaining abilities be restricted?
Yes f) Should parents be allowed to use vouchers to send their children to any school?
Yes g) Do you support state funding for charter schools?
Yes h) Do you suppport the state government providing college students with financial aid?
No i) Should illegal immigrants who graduate from Idaho high schools be eligible for in-state tuition at public universities?
d) and e): I think our public education system is in great disarray. I believe most teachers are good, and anything we do should strengthen our teacher base and should allow teachers the flexibility to do their job: Teach Children. I had some bad teachers in school, and why they kept their job is beyond me. Tenure is probably nice to have, but in any other job in the private sector, if you don't perform, you get fired. Why can't government employees be held to the same standards? We need to offer a globally-competitive education, while attracting talented, positive teachers.
Yes a) Do you support state funding for the development of alternative energy?
No b) Do you support state funding for the development of traditional domestic energy sources (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil)?
Yes c) Do you support state funding for improvements to Idaho's energy infrastructure?
Yes d) Do you support state funding for open space preservation?
No e) Do you support enacting environmental regulations aimed at reducing the effects of climate change?
e) I think climate change is natural. Our Sun is getting hotter, so all the planets in our solar system are "warming". However, pollution is accelerating this effect on the earth, but I do not buy into the UN carbon-tax plan. Anyone who researches energy, should look up Nassim Haramein. We desperately need to look beyond digging up substances buried in our ground for thousands of years and burning them to produce energy. The universe is made of energy, and technology has been developed to harness this natural phenomenon. A Great Worldwide Revolution is about to begin because of this!
No a) Do you support restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns?
No b) Should background checks be required on gun sales between private citizens at gun shows?
Yes c) Should citizens be allowed to carry concealed guns?
No d) Should a license be required for gun possession?
The original intent of the 2nd Amendment was to allow "we the people" the right to protect ourselves from our own government. Violence exists whether its bombs, knives or guns. Violent criminals will always find a way to hurt others, that is why I believe law-abiding citizens should be allowed to carry guns and we should greatly increase punishment for any violent criminal offense. I will NEVER vote to take 2nd Amendment rights away.
Yes a) Do you support a universally-accessible, publicly-administered health insurance option?
Yes b) Do you support expanding access to health care through commercial health insurance reform?
Yes c) Do you support interstate health insurance compacts?
No d) Do you support requiring individuals to purchase health care insurance?
Yes e) Do you support monetary limits on damages that can be collected in malpractice lawsuits?
Yes f) Do you support allowing doctors to prescribe marijuana to their patients for medicinal purposes?
No one should be forced to buy insurance. If government is involved in any application of health care, it should be actual HEALTH CARE, not just health insurance. Competition should be allowed state by state, and people should have the right to sue if their doctor harms a person more than they help, but the monetary amount should be set to a reasonable level. Although, how can you put a price on a human life?
No a) Should marriage only be between one man and one woman?
Yes b) Should same-sex couples be allowed to form civil unions?
Yes c) Do you support the inclusion of sexual orientation in Idaho's anti-discrimination laws?
Yes d) Do you support the inclusion of gender identity in Idaho's anti-discrimination laws?
Government should stay out of people's private lives. People should not force their religious views on others through our government.
Energy Policy: We can save our economy with the clean, cheap production of free energy. The technology exists, and Idaho can quite literally save the world if we allow this technology to be developed. Economic policy, Addressing Inflation: Our federal government's decades of out of control spending has had a devastating impact on our dollar's purchasing power, which affects all Americans adversely, especially the middle-class. It has been proven time and time again: increasing taxes actually decreases government revenues. I would proudly support efforts to lower our states income tax rate to help stimulate new economic activity in our state.

Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.

arrow_upward