Card image cap

Michael Krsiean's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Key


Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.

Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.

Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.

Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.

Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.

Vote Smart did not send the Political Courage Test to this office, or election status. Please call our Voter's Research Hotline at 1-888-VOTE SMART (1-888-868-3762) for more information.

What is the Political Courage Test?

Issue Positions

For Presidential and Congressional candidates who refuse to provide voters with their positions, Vote Smart has researched their public records to determine their likely responses. These issue positions are from 2010.

  • Michael Krsiean. Right to Life. "I believe that an unborn child is fully human, a blessing from the Lord Jesus Christ and is deserving of our highest level of protection - ALL THE TIME. A civilized society should do no less!" (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Overview. "While I consider myself to be a Christian, I have no litmus test for what my fellow Americans should believe. My Christianity is what continually motivates and encourages me. This country was founded upon the desire for liberty...and a HUGE motivating factor for those that forged this nation was the freedom to practice a religion of their choice, or none at all. As firmly as I fight for the rights of the unborn and firearms freedom, I will fight for the freedom of the people to exercise their right to practice any non-violent religion." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Abortion. "ABORTION is the most vicious social evil of our time. From embryonic research through partial birth abortion, this practice must end and all people must open their eyes to the reality that babies are babies regardless of whether they have exited the birth canal or not." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Taxes. "BERATE THE FAMILY FARMERS and KILL THE ESTATE TAX. Ron Kind has voted to keep the estate tax. This means that family assets, especially family farms, which are precious in my eyes, must be carved up like cheese so we can pay the tyrannical government when our parents or family members die--up to 40% in many cases. This is a horrible thing to do to families and I aim to do ALL I can to put an end to the death tax." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Taxes. "TAXATION through a privacy infringing and overly complex income tax is Marxist in nature and counter to Liberty and American success. Elimination of the IRS is one of my main legislative initiatives. The FairTax is much more compatible with our Constitutional Republic and I support it." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Press Release: Congratulations to Kapanke for Publishing Stances. "I want to decrease and then eliminate it. Dan wants to massage and keep the IRS, I want to slash spending and get the IRS out of our lives by going to a citizen controlled sales tax (FAIRTAX) with its prebate feature." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Jobs and the Economy. "STIMULUS was a huge mistake with no traceability. A HUGE spending folly for which I am afraid we will be seeing repercussions soon. We don't know where our money went and the FED refuses to come clean. An unacceptable situation! I will work to open the Fed, dismantle the Fed, and return all money to the American taxpayers." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Tim Gray's Discussion with WI-3 Candidate Michael Krsiean (I). 14 August 2010. "That said, I believe the following organizations not only exist outside constitutional authority, but in many instances they are creating regulations that bear the same weight as power of law but created through unelected authorities: Budget savings in Billions of Dollars: Phase-out of Social Security: 792..." (www.couleeconservatives.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Other Social Issues. "I am also a proponent of the death penalty for certain crimes and would work to minimize death row times and decrease the backlog." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Education. "EDUCATION is best left to state or local authorities to manage and fund. Eliminating the Department of Education is one of my main legislative initiatives. Keeping our money in our local schools and providing tax relief for those who send their children to private schools is something I support." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. 2010. ResistNet.com: Profile Information. Responded: "Climate Alarmism, Universal Healthcare, Gun Control, Constitutional Infringements, Immorality/Godlessness" to the question: "What issues concern you the most?" (www.resistnet.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Cap and Trade "Nice. A new commodity market for Wall Street where people make money by trading carbon credits and controlling what energy we use, how much we use, and when we use it. I simply don't know what to say. We are letting slip away our country and freedoms that so many died to defend. If the American people re-elect any of the criminals that promote and vote in favor of this piece of draconian and totalitarian dog vomit I'll hang my head in shame. Is this really the way we want to live? Looking over our shoulders whenever we start a lawn mower or chainsaw? What more can I say about this? Radical Environmentalism that pushes this garbage and the global warming hog wash on us must be confronted and defeated. The war against radical environmentalism is something that will be fought soon - if YOU send the right people to congress. Will you? Will you back them up?? Do I need to say I'll work to strip this off the books?" (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Second Amendment Rights. "With the understanding that a healthy constitutional government has nothing to fear from law abiding armed citizens, and that people who shouldn't have firearms probably shouldn't be roaming around the general public anyway, all these federal regulations on firearms and their owners must be repealed." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Krsiean Campaign: Healthcare Rebirth; A Fresh Out-of-the-Box Proposal. "Let me begin by saying, the first priority after my election will be to repeal and kill the Healthcare takeover bill that was just recently approved and signed. It is an ill-conceived, illicitly won, and unconstitutional bill on many fronts. The federal government had no business even considering this legislation. But what to do instead? We must go beyond the tired old political tricks of issuing non-binding statements and resolutions that merely pay lip service to our concerns." (www.ronpaulforums.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Health Care. "The federal government has no authority to launch a medical takeover! None. There are things it should do to drastically reduce costs such as tort reform, repealing coverage mandates and encouraging individual rather than employer policies. If the healthcare takeover is made into law, I vow to work with other constitutionalists and conservatives to strip it off the books! We need to eliminate the insurance company middleman that is absorbing health dollars from our pocket and keeping it as profit. My solution is simply to invest our money directly into our local hospitals much like a cooperative. A portion of these funds goes to regional specialist centers. Healthcare is divorced from our place of employment and attached to whatever care facility we choose. Our portion of the coop that we've invested in the local hospital is portable with us if and when we move to a different area." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Jobs and the Economy. "3. Deport illegals that take our jobs and severely fine or put out of business companies that hire them." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Illegal Immigration. "Secure our borders to regain access control over sea, air and land. Deport prisoners and at-large illegals that any government agency discovers. Punish employers that employ illegals. Bill their home countries for the cost of temporarily housing and deporting them." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Illegal Immigration. "For incarcerated convicted violent illegal prisoners, deportation must be instituted with the understanding that if they return to the US and are caught they will be physically punished and deported or executed. Other prisoners must be deported with the understanding that severe physical punishment will be followed by deportation upon return to America. Finally, establish English as the official language of the United States." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. 2010. Press Release: Support for Terry Jones. 9 September 2010."Does Pastor Terry's action constitute an increased threat to our men and women defending our nation overseas? Perhaps, however the increased threat to our troops posed by ridiculous Rules of Engagement and keeping our troops over there for no good reason dwarf Pastor Terry's contribution. Shall we now quake in our boots from the Muslim menace? Are we descending into a people of appeasement? May it never be so." (www.wispolitics.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Facebook Post. 14 July 2010. "It's time we bring the troops home. Dividing up tens of thousands of American families to search for a few terrorist leaders is not the way to get Bin Laden. Bring the troops home, collect intell, wait for Bin Laden to resurface and then decapitate. When the ROE limit troops, we're not serious and they need to come home. Now." (www.facebook.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: War on Terror. "We have over 100,000 Americans in Afghanistan looking for one murderer and his thugs. That is potentially 100,000 American families disrupted. To me this is unacceptable. To wage this new age of warfare we need to have an intelligence network on the ground, in the sky and on the net that is second to none. We need pre-positioned, global, surgical, lightning strike capabilities and the will to use them. We must pro-actively, unapologetically and decisively take out verified terrorist targets where ever they are. Any government harboring terrorist activities should be put on notice that we will have no mercy and little patience listening to their responsive whining. Recall that during the cold war, no terrorist groups dared hijack Soviet aircraft. There was a reason. Swift and decisive death. Bring our infantries home and fully fund a new international intelligence agency(s) while giving them power and accountability to pro-actively eliminate verified threats. Yet, we must instill strong measures so that these resources cannot be used against Americans. For extended and/or larger scale warfare we must demand a congressional declaration of war to unify the country and congress. In all cases, we must not engage in other countries' disputes and wars unless our national security is in demonstrable and immediate danger. I am an advocate of preemptive strikes should there be a clear and present danger to the national security of the United States." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Tim Gray's Discussion with WI-3 Candidate Michael Krsiean (I). 14 August 2010. "I think we should be leaving Afghanistan." (www.couleeconservatives.com)
  • Michael Krsiean. Issue Position: Other Social Issues. "MARRIAGE is defined by the Lord in Genesis to be between one man and one woman. I agree with that and will defend it." (www.krsieanforcongress.com)
This candidate has responded to a Political Courage Test in a previous election. As a continued effort to provide the American public with factual information on candidates running for public office, these archived responses are made available here.
Pro-life a) Do you consider yourself pro-choice or pro-life?
No b) Should abortion be legal only within the first trimester of pregnancy?
No c) Should abortion be legal when the pregnancy resulted from incest or rape?
No d) Should abortion be legal when the life of the woman is endangered?
Yes e) Should federal subsidies be prohibited from being used for abortion procedures?
f) Other or expanded principles

1) SpendingIndicate what federal funding levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category- you can use a number more than once.2) TaxesIndicate what federal tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category- you can use a number more than once.

Eliminate a) Agriculture
Eliminate b) Arts
Slightly Decrease c) Defense
Slightly Increase 1) Intelligence operations
Slightly Decrease 2) Military hardware
Slightly Increase 3) National missile defense
Maintain Status 4) Salary and benefits for active duty personnel
Greatly Decrease 5) Programs to improve troop retention rates
Maintain Status 6) Research and development of new weapons
Eliminate d) Education
Eliminate e) Environment
Eliminate f) Homeland security
Eliminate g) International aid
Greatly Decrease h) Medical research
Eliminate i) Scientific research
Eliminate j) Space exploration
Eliminate k) United Nations
Eliminate l) Welfare
Eliminate m) Other or expanded categories
Slightly Decrease a) Alcohol taxes
Eliminate b) Capital gains taxes
Greatly Decrease c) Cigarette taxes
Maintain Status d) Corporate taxes
Greatly Decrease e) Gasoline taxes
Eliminate f) Income taxes (low-income families)
Eliminate g) Income taxes (middle-income families)
Eliminate h) Income taxes (high-income families)
Greatly Increase i) Other or expanded categories
Yes 3) Do you support the elimination of the federal estate tax?
Yes 4) Do you support requiring the federal budget to be balanced each year?
No 5) Do you support using government funds in an effort to stimulate and improve the economy?
Phase out Social Security slowly over next twenty years. Allow current and later generations to invest and control THEIR money as they see fit. Corporation for National and Community Service IRS BATF Dept. of Energy EPA Dept of Health and Human Services Dept of Housing and Urban Development Dept of Interior Dept of Labor NASA National Science Foundation Small Business Administration Others would be sharply cut such as Dept of State, Commerce, Transportation, Justice, Treasury. In the end, I will not stop until the items found in Article 1, Section 8 are the only ones funded federally. Reduce government 80%!
I believe the direct taxation of individuals goes against the spirit of our Constitution. It was against the law prior to the 16th Amendment. I support the repeal of the 16th Amendment (outlaw income tax!). Prior to income tax the federal government obtained funding through tariffs and excise taxes. We should return to this in addition to a consumption (sales) tax. American corporations are exporting our jobs because it is profitable for them to do so. That needs to change. Use tax breaks for domestic production. Use increased tariffs and capital gains for profits made with foreign production and labor.
In most cases government regulation, taxation and preventative legislation complicate life and add misery to our days with unintended consequences. This is especially true with huge and unread bills that are turned into law. Heavy taxation of the American worker makes him/her uncompetitive in the world market. If our federal taxes were slashed by 80%, the rebalancing of payroll sheets across the nation would drastically change the perceived need to export our jobs.
Yes a) Do you support privatizing elements of Social Security?
Yes b) Do you support reducing government regulations on the private sector?
No c) Do you support increasing the federal minimum wage?
Yes d) Do you support the ability of workers to unionize?
No e) Do you support federal funding for job-training programs that retrain displaced workers?
f) Other or expanded principles
No a) Do you support increasing the amount individuals are permitted to contribute to federal campaigns?
Yes b) Should Congress regulate indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
No c) Do you support removing all contribution limits on federal campaigns?
Yes d) Should candidates for federal office be encouraged to meet voluntary spending limits?
No e) Do you support giving the President the power of the line item veto for items concerning appropriations?
Yes f) Do you support limiting the President's ability to define how legislation is applied through the use of signing statements?
g) Other or expanded principles
Yes a) Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes?
No b) Do you support programs that provide prison inmates with vocational and job-related training and job-placement assistance when released?
No c) Do you support programs that provide prison inmates with substance abuse treatment?
No d) Do you support reduced prison sentences for non-violent offenders?
Yes e) Do you support mandatory prison sentences for selling illegal drugs?
The war on drugs has not worked and gets worse each day. It is time to drop the bottom out of the black market of drugs and de-criminalize them. The Drug Enforcement Agency can then be defunded and dismantled with tax payers reaping the benefits. We will then have the ability to tax the drug purchases and encourage local governments to identify and assist habitual problem users.
No a) Do you support federal education standards and testing requirements for K-12 students?
No b) Do you support federal funding for universal pre-K programs?
No c) Do you support federal funding for charter schools?
No d) Do you support federal funding for K-12 school vouchers?
No e) Do you support the federal government providing college students with financial aid?
Tuition continues to rise because colleges and universities know that our tax money will continue to flow regardless of cost. This must end. Eliminate federal aid, reduce taxes on individuals. The results are education costs go down (at least payroll), and students and their families can better afford college because their tax load is lighter.
No a) Do you support enacting environmental regulations aimed at reducing the effects of climate change?
No b) Do you support international emissions targets aimed at reducing the effects of climate change?
No c) Do you support allowing energy producers to trade carbon credits under a "cap and trade" system?
No d) Do you support strengthening fuel efficiency standards on all gasoline and diesel-powered engines, including cars, trucks, and sport utility vehicles?
Yes e) Do you support domestic oil exploration in federally-protected areas?
No f) Do you support federal funding for the development of alternative energy?
Yes g) Do you support the development of nuclear reactors?
I will sponsor bills that mandate federally held lands be sold or granted back to the States that they fall within. Each State, and their localities are the best controllers over their own environments. The US constitution provides no authority for environmental control or energy management by the federal government. 'Interstate commerce' must return to the original definition. It originally related to taxation issues only, per the Federalist Papers.
No a) Do you support restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns?
Yes b) Do you believe that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of individual citizens to own guns?
Yes c) Do you support allowing individuals to carry concealed guns?
No d) Do you support a ban on assault rifles?
Clearly the 2nd Amendment and the spirit of the US constitution and the backdrop of the recent war of independence demonstrate firearm ownership is an individual right. It honestly cannot be interpreted any other way due to the intended nature of the Amendment -- to guard against governmental tyranny. No federal authority to restrict individual firearms is provided by the US Constitution. If the States wish to trample on the natural rights of their citizens, then those States must answer for it or the citizen is afforded freedom to leave that state.
No a) Do you support a publicly-administered health insurance option?
Yes b) Do you support expanding access to health care through commercial health insurance reform?
Yes c) Should the federal government expand eligibility for tax-free medical savings accounts?
No d) Do you support monetary limits on damages that can be collected in malpractice lawsuits?
Yes e) Do you support relaxing regulations on the importation of prescription drugs?
I support the elimination of the Health Insurance middlemen and the (non-governmental) formation of Cooperatives and Trusts between people and their local and regional hospitals. I do not necessarily support limits on liability lawsuits since that is a punitive and compensative lever that may be needed with a deregulated health insurance industry.
No a) Do you support a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants?
No b) Do you support decreasing the number of legal immigrants allowed into the country?
Yes c) Do you support establishing English as the official national language?
Yes d) Do you support the enforcement of federal immigration laws by state and local police?
e) Other or expanded principles
No a) Do you support United States military action in Afghanistan?
No b) Do you support increasing military assistance for Afghanistan?
No c) Do you support increasing economic development assistance for Afghanistan?
Yes d) Should the United States continue to strike suspected terrorist targets in Pakistan?
No e) Do you support granting aid to countries when it is in the security interests of the United States?
No f) Should the United States support the creation of a Palestinian state?
No g) Do you support increasing sanctions on Iran if it continues to defy United Nations mandates?
Yes h) Do you support the withdrawal of United States troops from Iraq?
No i) Do you support the United States' involvement in free trade agreements?
Dividing hundreds of thousands of American families to chase one man and a few of his terrorist buddies is absurd. I support a withdrawal of forces immediately. We then wait for the resurfacing of the terrorists and kill them immediately. Future threats, as intelligence gathering from the sky and on the ground find them must be dealt with immediately and with overwhelming tactical force. Intelligence, political guts and short notice strike capability will be key in confronting these future threats.
Yes a) Should marriage only be between one man and one woman?
No b) Do you support allowing openly-gay men and women to serve in the United States military?
No c) Do you support federal funding for embryonic stem cell research?
Yes d) Should the federal government end affirmative action programs?
e) Other or expanded principles
1.) Re-establishing authentic partnership and representation between the Representative in Congress and constituents. READ THE BILLS! This will re-establish the trust and honor in Public Office. 2.) Redefine legislative rules to simplify, limit size and narrow focus of the bills brought before congress. Limit the number of staffers serving Representatives, Senators and the President. 3.) Reorganize the federal government to eliminate extra-constitutional departments and bureaus, balance the budget, pay off debt and reduce taxation. A growing economy, thousands of new businesses and plentiful jobs should follow. 4.) Step down from congress and return to nurture my family, business and farm.

Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.

arrow_upward