Card image cap

Judy Jones' Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Key


Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.

Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.

Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.

Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.

Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.

California State Legislative Election 2010 Political Courage Test

Pro-choice a) Do you consider yourself pro-choice or pro-life?
No b) Should abortion be legal only within the first trimester of pregnancy?
Yes c) Should abortion be legal when the pregnancy resulted from incest or rape?
Yes d) Should abortion be legal when the life of the woman is endangered?
No e) Do you support requiring parental notification before an abortion is performed on a minor?
No f) Do you support requiring parental consent before an abortion is performed on a minor?
Yes g) Do you support sexual education programs that include information on abstinence, contraceptives, and HIV/STD prevention methods?
No h) Do you support abstinence-only sexual education programs?
I feel fortunate that I myself never had to make a personal decision about abortion. I would find it very difficult to make that choice. However, I would not like to impose my beliefs on anyone else. I feel strongly that abortion should be the decision between a woman and her doctor. I would like to limit the trimesters of legal abortion, but other circumstances (such as danger to the mother's life) could appear later than the first trimester so exceptions would have to be allowed.

1) State SpendingIndicate what state funding levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one level per category; you may use a number more than once.2) State TaxesIndicate what state tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one level per category; you may use a number more than once.3) Budget StabilizationIndicate which proposals you support (if any) for balancing California's budget.

Greatly Increase a) Education (higher)
Greatly Increase b) Education (K-12)
Slightly Increase c) Environment
Slightly Increase d) Health care
Maintain Status e) Law enforcement
Slightly Increase f) Transportation and highway infrastructure
Maintain Status g) Welfare
Slightly Increase a) Alcohol taxes
Slightly Increase b) Cigarette taxes
c) Corporate taxes
Slightly Increase d) Gasoline taxes
Slightly Increase e) Property taxes
Maintain Status f) Sales taxes
Slightly Decrease g) Income taxes (low-income families)
Slightly Decrease h) Income taxes (middle-income families)
Greatly Increase i) Income taxes (high-income families)
Yes a) Tapping into California's "rainy day" fund
Yes b) Issuing the early release of certain non-violent offenders
No c) Instituting mandatory furloughs and layoffs for state employees
No d) Reducing benefits for Medicaid recipients
No e) Privatizing certain government services
I would prefer to take budget cuts in prisons over education. We should stop cutting education funding!! We urgently need infrastructure repair and getting people to work on it would also help our employment. However, it would require some funding/borrowing that is difficult right now.
Some corporate taxes should be increased and others decreased. For example, if jobs are being created in the US, especially in California, then some tax breaks should be provided. However, I would support a tax on all jobs created overseas, and impose import taxes.
Not sure that the "rainy day" fund question makes sense, since we don't have any money there. I believe state employees and state agencies should all be at the table when cuts are being considered. With collaboration, cooperation, and listening to all sides, we should be able to find some common ground and reach agreements. Issuing mandatory furloughs, layoffs, salary reductions--anything mandatory without everyone involved at the table, I would disagree with.

e) Do you support limits on the following types of contributions to candidates for state government?

a) Should California hold a constitutional convention to rewrite the state constitution?
Yes b) Do you support changing the requirement for state budget passage from a two-thirds vote to a majority vote?
Yes c) Do you support limits on the number of terms for California governors?
d) Do you support limits on the number of terms for California state legislators?
1) Individual
2) Political Action Committee
Yes 3) Corporate
4) Political Party
Yes f) Should candidates for state office be encouraged to meet voluntary spending limits?
Yes g) Do you support requiring full and timely disclosure of campaign finance information?
I support limits on all of the above to some extent. However, it is currently more complicated than necessary and in addition it should make some sense in comparison to the limits for US government candidates.
No a) Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes?
Yes b) Do you support alternatives to incarceration for certain non-violent offenders, such as mandatory counseling or substance abuse treatment?
Yes c) Should the possession of small amounts of marijuana be decriminalized?
d) Should a minor accused of a violent crime be prosecuted as an adult?
e) Should a minor who sends sexually-explicit or nude photos by cell phone face criminal charges?
f) Do you support the enforcement of federal immigration laws by state and local police?
I don't support the wording of the questions about minors. There can be a wide range of maturity and understanding of the crimes committed among minors. There should be some leeway offered to the courts/judges, etc. to determine whether or not adult prosecution is applicable. I do believe that if our federal immigration laws were enforced, we would not have our current immigration issues. However, enforcement by state and local police presents some conflicts because their firs priority should be public safety and immigrants may not be comfortable reporting crimes, coming forward as witnesses, etc. And, we want fed funding.
a) Do you support reducing government regulations on the private sector?
Yes b) Do you support increased state funding for job-training programs that re-train displaced workers?
Yes c) Do you support expanding access to unemployment benefits?
Yes d) Do you support providing financial incentives to the private sector for the purpose of job creation?
Yes e) Do you support increased spending on infrastructure projects for the purpose of job creation?
Yes f) Do you support providing direct financial assistance to homeowners facing foreclosure?
No g) Do you support suspending the sale of bonds that would finance the California high-speed rail?
I do agree that government regulations can impede investment projects in the private sector. However, I would prefer to streamline the approval processes and make it easier to comply with the regulations rather than eliminate regulations. Some consolidation of processes and regulations therefore, could reduce the number of regulations.
a) Do you support national education standards?
b) Do you support requiring public schools to administer high school exit exams?
c) Do you support using a merit pay system for teachers?
d) Do you support state funding for charter schools?
Yes e) Do you support the state government providing college students with financial aid?
f) Should illegal immigrants who graduate from California high schools be eligible for in-state tuition at public universities?
"Sometimes" is my answer to most of above. Nationally there should be some minimum standard since I don't believe a high school educations should vary that much between states. Some exit requirement is necessary, but exams might be just one of multiple requirements that would not all be required. Pay should include some merit (the difficulty is how you measure fairly), but also some on seniority, and level of pay should transfer between districts. Sometimes state funding for charter schools should be availalbe, if that's the option chosen to replace a public school. Illegal immigrant HS grads are in limbo.
Yes a) Do you support state funding for the development of alternative energy?
No b) Do you support state funding for the development of traditional domestic energy sources (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil)?
No c) Do you support providing financial incentives to farms that produce biofuel crops?
Yes d) Do you support state funding for improvements to California's energy infrastructure?
Yes e) Do you support state funding for open space preservation?
Yes f) Do you support enacting environmental regulations aimed at reducing the effects of climate change?
I have personal experience with a survey directed towards determining how Orange County cities are enacting practices that reduce green house gas. Throughout the county, cities have been successful in their efforts, such as with energy efficient lights, with major cost savings -- their efforts have been a win for their budget and a win for the environment!
Yes a) Do you support restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns?
Yes b) Do you support requiring background checks on gun sales between private citizens at gun shows?
c) Do you support allowing individuals to carry concealed guns?
Yes d) Do you support requiring a license for gun possession?
Individuals should have to have a reason to carry a concelaed gun, and then should be given a permit to carry and conceal that weapon.
Yes a) Do you support the establishment of a single-payer, publicly-administered health care system for California?
Yes b) Do you support a universally-accessible, publicly-administered health insurance option?
No c) Do you support expanding access to health care through commercial health insurance reform?
Yes d) Do you support interstate health insurance compacts?
No e) Should individuals be required to purchase health care insurance?
No f) Do you support monetary limits on damages that can be collected in malpractice lawsuits?
Yes g) Do you support legalizing physician-assisted suicide in California?
Yes h) Do you support allowing doctors to prescribe marijuana to their patients for medicinal purposes?
i) Other or expanded principles
No a) Should marriage only be between one man and one woman?
Yes b) Should California allow same-sex couples to form domestic partnerships?
Yes c) Do you support state funding for stem cell research?
Yes d) Do you support state funding for embryonic stem cell research?
e) Do you support the state's use of affirmative action?
Yes f) Do you support the inclusion of sexual orientation in California's anti-discrimination laws?
Yes g) Do you support the inclusion of gender identity in California's anti-discrimination laws?
I believe that affirmative action is sometimes required, but not always...and, need to confirm how it is currently working.
1. Jobs in the new green economy. 2. Incentives for small businesses and entrprenuers. 3. Eliminate further cuts to educational funding Funding to stop educational cuts should come from the oil extraction fee.

Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.

arrow_upward