Card image cap

Tom McClintock's Ratings and Endorsements

Office:

On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House (CA) - District 5

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

100%
2014
94%
2009-2010
94%
2009-2010
100%
2019-2020
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
100%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
92%
2013-2014
92%
2013-2014
100%
2011-2012
100%
2011-2012
100%
2009-2010
100%
2009-2010
100%
2009
100%
2009
100%
2014
100%
2011
100%
2011
100%
2009-2010
100%
2009-2010
100%
2023
95%
2022
95%
2022
92%
2021
92%
2021
87%
2020
87%
2020
91%
2019
91%
2019
100%
2018
100%
2018
89%
2017
89%
2017
92%
2016
92%
2016
82%
2015
82%
2015
100%
2014
100%
2014
63%
2013-2014
63%
2013-2014
100%
2013
100%
2013
83%
2012
83%
2012
90%
2011
90%
2011
100%
2009-2010
100%
2009-2010
100%
2024
0%
2023
0%
2023
100%
2022
100%
2022
100%
2021
100%
2021
80%
2020
80%
2020
33%
2019
33%
2019
12%
2018
12%
2018
56%
2017
56%
2017
71%
2016
71%
2016
36%
2015
36%
2015
33%
2014
33%
2014
38%
2013
38%
2013
21%
2012
21%
2012
33%
2011
33%
2011
94%
2009
85%
2022
95%
2015
95%
2015
90%
2013
95%
2013
90%
2013
95%
2013
100%
2013
100%
2013
92%
2009
100%
2009
92%
2009
100%
2009
85%
2024
80%
2023-2024
80%
2023-2024
80%
2023-2024
80%
2023-2024
85%
2023
85%
2023
86%
2021-2022
86%
2021-2022
86%
2021-2022
86%
2021-2022
85%
2021-2022
85%
2021-2022
85%
2021-2022
85%
2021-2022
70%
2019-2020
70%
2019-2020
70%
2019-2020
70%
2019-2020
77%
2017-2018
77%
2017-2018
77%
2017-2018
77%
2017-2018
71%
2015-2016
71%
2015-2016
71%
2015-2016
71%
2015-2016
67%
2015
67%
2015
93%
2014
93%
2014
100%
2014
100%
2014
93%
2013-2014
93%
2013-2014
93%
2013-2014
93%
2013-2014
100%
2013
100%
2013
93%
2011-2012
93%
2011-2012
93%
2011-2012
93%
2011-2012
100%
2011
100%
2011
95%
2011
95%
2011
90%
2010
90%
2010
80%
2009-2010
80%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
80%
2009-2010
80%
2009-2010
100%
2009
95%
2009
100%
2009
90%
2009
95%
2009
90%
2009
arrow_upward