Card image cap

James Edmunds II's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

83%
2011-2012
25%
2018
88%
2019
88%
2019
85%
2018
85%
2018
83%
2017
83%
2017
85%
2017
85%
2017
87%
2016
87%
2016
81%
2015
81%
2015
84%
2014-2015
84%
2014-2015
87%
2014
87%
2014
57%
2013
57%
2013
0%
2013
0%
2013
78%
2012
78%
2012
57%
2012
57%
2012
66%
2012
66%
2012
73%
2012
73%
2012
90%
2012
90%
2012
72
2010
72
2010
70%
2010
70%
2010
71
2010
71
2010
43
2010
43
2010
35%
2020
0%
2017
100%
2016
100%
2016
25%
2013
25%
2012
8%
2021-2022
8%
2021-2022
45%
2021
48%
2023
50%
2022
49%
2022
44%
2021
49%
2021
50%
2020
39%
2020
53%
2019
42%
2019
55%
2018
38%
2018
58%
2017
57%
2017
38%
2016
56%
2016
83%
2015
60%
2015
67%
2014
64%
2013
56%
2013
63%
2012
40%
2011
57%
2010
52%
2000-2012
47%
2000-2011
57%
2000-2010
44%
2023
40%
2022
36%
2022
14%
2021
35%
2021
25%
2020
43%
2019
50%
2019
50%
2018
28%
2017
40%
2017
40%
2016-2020
40%
2016-2020
40%
2016
43%
2015-2019
43%
2015-2019
38%
2015
47%
2014-2018
47%
2014-2018
71%
2014
58%
2020
81%
2018-2019
88%
2016-2017
82%
2014-2015
83%
2013
95%
2010-2011
100%
2019
100%
2019
42%
2018
42%
2018
100%
2018
100%
2018
38%
2017
38%
2017
38%
2016
38%
2016
40%
2015
40%
2015
32%
2014
32%
2014
13%
2012
13%
2012
0%
2010
9%
2020
9%
2020
5%
2019
5%
2019
35%
2020
0%
2017
100%
2016
100%
2016
25%
2013
25%
2012
89%
2020-2021
58%
2020
58%
2020
81%
2018-2019
81%
2018-2019
88%
2016-2017
88%
2016-2017
82%
2014-2015
82%
2014-2015
83%
2013
83%
2013
95%
2010-2011
95%
2010-2011
64%
2019
75%
2019
75%
2019
60%
2018
60%
2018
63%
2018
63%
2018
63%
2017
94%
2017
94%
2017
63%
2017
56%
2016
45%
2016
45%
2016
56%
2016
81%
2015
81%
2015
75%
2014
75%
2014
45%
2013
45%
2013
75%
2012-2017
75%
2012-2017
35%
2012
35%
2012
33%
2004-2014
33%
2004-2014
arrow_upward