Card image cap

Rob Bishop's Ratings and Endorsements

On The Ballot: Running, Republican for State House (UT) - District 6

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

20%
2017-2018
20%
2017-2018
8%
2017
8%
2017
40%
2015-2016
40%
2015-2016
93%
2009-2010
100%
2007-2008
100%
2005-2006
67%
2003
100%
2017-2018
-6
2003-2004
4%
2013-2014
4%
2013-2014
23%
2013-2014
23%
2013-2014
10%
2013
0%
2012
25%
2003-2004
25%
2003-2004
0%
2003
100%
2012
100%
2012
0%
2017-2018
0%
2015-2016
14%
2013-2014
50%
2003
93%
2004
100%
2011
100%
2009-2010
100%
2007-2008
90%
2004
90%
2003
100%
2011-2012
100%
2011
100%
2009-2010
95%
2007-2008
100%
2005-2006
95%
2003-2004
92%
2003
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
94%
2009
0
2005
21%
2013-2014
25%
2009-2010
25%
2009-2010
11
2007-2008
0%
2005-2006
67%
2017-2018
67%
2017-2018
63%
2015-2016
63%
2015-2016
68%
2015
68%
2014
68%
2014
61%
2013-2014
61%
2013-2014
80%
2013
81%
2011-2012
81%
2011-2012
90%
2011
89%
2011
89%
2010
91%
2009-2010
91%
2009-2010
92%
2009-2010
92%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
90%
2009-2010
94%
2009
88%
2009
100%
2009
70%
2007-2008
70%
2007-2008
67%
2007
47%
2006
25%
2005
33%
2004
60%
2004
50%
2003
arrow_upward